SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 22 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 21, 2026Updated on Data refresh21 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Uttarakhand.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Uttarakhand: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
KekaNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Uttarakhandbuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Uttarakhand · Manufacturing

Best Manufacturing Software in Uttarakhand

481 words · keyword: Best Manufacturing Software in Uttarakhand

Expert verdict

Vendors demonstrate varying degrees of support for the April 2026 statutory landscape, with a clear emphasis on the 50% basic pay rule and Income Tax Act, 2025 reporting. Robust F&F settlement capabilities are not consistently detailed, requiring further vendor clarification.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 3/10

Zoho's extensive suite offers broad business functionality, but specific payroll and statutory compliance details for the Indian market, particularly concerning the April 2026 mandates, are not evident in the provided research excerpts. Further investigation into their dedicated payroll module is recommended.

Key tech: Comprehensive business software suite

Special note for Uttarakhand

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Uttarakhand.

Pros

  • Comprehensive business software suite
  • Strong brand recognition and global presence
  • Focus on privacy and security

Cons

  • Limited specific payroll/statutory compliance details in research
  • No clear evidence of 50% basic pay rule adherence or F&F timelines

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 2/10

Keka appears to be a general HR software solution, but the provided research excerpts lack specific details regarding its payroll capabilities and adherence to Indian statutory requirements as of April 2026. Its suitability for complex payroll and compliance needs is unconfirmed.

Key tech: Focus on HR software

Special note for Uttarakhand

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Uttarakhand.

Pros

  • Focus on HR software
  • Modern interface implied
  • Scalable for businesses

Cons

  • No specific payroll or statutory compliance details found
  • Lack of evidence for 50% basic pay rule or F&F timelines

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR demonstrates a strong understanding of Indian payroll compliance, explicitly referencing the '50% Wage Rule' and providing detailed statutory compliance features including TDS and PT. However, specific timelines for Full and Final settlements are not detailed.

Key tech: Explicit mention of '50% Wage Rule Explained'

Special note for Uttarakhand

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Uttarakhand.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of '50% Wage Rule Explained'
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, PT, TDS)
  • Extensive reporting capabilities

Cons

  • No specific mention of Section 17(2) or 48-hour F&F settlement
  • Limited detail on contractor payment compliance

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 3/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned as a modern payroll solution, but the research excerpts are limited and do not provide sufficient detail on its statutory compliance features, particularly concerning the 50% basic pay rule or exit settlement timelines. Its integration with RazorpayX current account is noted.

Key tech: Integrated with RazorpayX current account

Special note for Uttarakhand

Map PT + labour filings for Uttarakhand against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Integrated with RazorpayX current account
  • Modern payroll solution positioning
  • Focus on payouts

Cons

  • Insufficient detail on statutory compliance for April 2026
  • No evidence of 50% basic pay rule support or F&F timelines

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 4/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a focus on accuracy and audit readiness. While it aims for end-to-end payroll processing, specific evidence for adherence to the April 2026 Indian statutory mandates, such as the 50% basic pay rule or detailed F&F settlement, is not present in the provided research.

Key tech: Global payroll solution

Special note for Uttarakhand

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Uttarakhand in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Global payroll solution
  • Focus on accuracy and audit readiness
  • Unified platform

Cons

  • Lack of specific Indian statutory compliance details for April 2026
  • No explicit mention of 50% basic pay rule or F&F timelines

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 7/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native Indian payroll engine with strong statutory compliance features, including TDS and PT calculations, and mentions handling of CTC components. However, explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule and detailed F&F settlement timelines is absent.

Key tech: Native Indian payroll engine with real-time rule updates

Special note for Uttarakhand

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Uttarakhand on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native Indian payroll engine with real-time rule updates
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS)
  • Handles various CTC components and tax declarations

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of 50% basic pay rule adherence
  • Specific Section 17(2) / 48-hour F&F settlement timelines not detailed

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Uttarakhand · Manufacturing (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Uttarakhand.
  • For Uttarakhand shop-floor and contract labour: work orders, man-days, and alignment with state labour and welfare board norms.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Uttarakhand).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Uttarakhand payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Uttarakhand Manufacturing HR & Payroll Software Audit: April 2026

This audit assesses HR, payroll, and labour-compliance software solutions against key statutory requirements applicable in India as of April 2026, with a specific focus on Uttarakhand and the manufacturing sector.

Statutory Authority for Manufacturing

In India, the manufacturing sector is subject to a comprehensive framework of labour laws, including the Code on Wages, 2019, the Code on Industrial Relations, 2020, and the Code on Social Security, 2020. These codes aim to consolidate and simplify existing labour legislation. For Uttarakhand, specific state-level notifications and amendments may also apply, particularly concerning professional tax and other local levies. Ensuring compliance with these evolving regulations is paramount for businesses operating in the manufacturing domain.

Automation vs. Manual Risk

Manual payroll processing and HR management expose businesses to significant risks, including calculation errors, non-compliance with statutory deductions (ESI, PF, PT), and potential penalties. Automation through robust HRMS and payroll software mitigates these risks by ensuring accurate, timely, and compliant processing. This is particularly critical for statutory filings and remittances. For instance, incorrect ESI and PF calculations can lead to substantial financial liabilities and legal repercussions. Similarly, managing contract labour payments requires adherence to specific regulations to avoid disputes and penalties. The Code on Wages, 2019, mandates that the basic salary component must be at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC) for in-scope wage components, a critical factor for accurate PF and gratuity calculations, which automated systems can reliably enforce.

Uttarakhand Specifics

While the core Indian labour codes apply nationwide, specific nuances can arise at the state level. For Uttarakhand, businesses must remain vigilant regarding any state-specific directives or amendments to labour laws. The Code on Wages, 2019, with its emphasis on the 50% basic pay rule, is a significant consideration for structuring CTC. The Income Tax Act, 2025, also necessitates accurate employer reporting and deduction capabilities, which are crucial for tax compliance in Uttarakhand.

Income Tax Act, 2025 Reporting

Effective April 2026, employers are expected to leverage digital platforms for enhanced reporting under the Income Tax Act, 2025. This includes accurate calculation and deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), facilitating employee investment declarations, and generating necessary tax forms (like Form 16). Software solutions that offer robust TDS management and digital reporting capabilities are essential for seamless compliance and for providing employees with accurate tax information.

Category Maturity /10

This category of HR and payroll software is highly mature, with established players offering comprehensive features. The focus has shifted towards enhanced automation, AI-driven insights, and deeper statutory compliance, especially with the implementation of the new Labour Codes. The ability to handle complex wage structures, state-specific nuances, and evolving tax regulations is a key differentiator. The market generally provides solutions capable of meeting the April 2026 statutory landscape, but due diligence on specific features and jurisdictional support is always advised.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.