SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Rajasthan.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Rajasthan: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesNo or verify with vendor
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Rajasthanbuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Rajasthan · Manufacturing

Best Manufacturing Software in Rajasthan

381 words · keyword: Best Manufacturing Software in Rajasthan

Expert verdict

For Rajasthan's manufacturing sector, HR and payroll software must prioritize strict adherence to the 50% Basic vs. CTC rule and the Section 17(2) F&F settlement timeline. Vendors demonstrating robust configuration for these mandates, alongside comprehensive Income Tax Act 2025 reporting, offer a defensible compliance posture.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho's broad suite offers potential for integrated HR and payroll functions, but specific research supporting its deep statutory configuration for Rajasthan's manufacturing sector, particularly regarding the 50% Basic rule and expedited F&F settlements, is not evident.

Key tech: Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications for potential integration.

Special note for Rajasthan

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Rajasthan.

Pros

  • Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications for potential integration.
  • Known for its user-friendly interface and accessibility.
  • Provides a strong foundation for general business operations.

Cons

  • Specific capabilities for the 50% Basic vs. CTC rule in Rajasthan are not detailed.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) F&F settlement timelines or expedited processing.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 6/10

Keka positions itself as a compliance-focused HR and payroll solution, claiming to handle rules across all 50 states, which suggests potential for addressing Rajasthan's specific wage structure mandates. However, explicit confirmation of the 50% Basic rule configuration and Section 17(2) F&F timelines requires further diligence.

Key tech: Claims to handle compliance across all 50 states, implying adaptability to state-specific rules.

Special note for Rajasthan

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Rajasthan.

Pros

  • Claims to handle compliance across all 50 states, implying adaptability to state-specific rules.
  • Offers comprehensive HR and payroll modules, including expense management and benefits administration.
  • Focuses on automation for payroll processing and compliance.

Cons

  • Direct evidence of configuring the 50% Basic vs. CTC rule for Rajasthan is not provided.
  • The research is silent on explicit support for the Section 17(2) 48-hour F&F settlement mandate.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 7/10

greytHR explicitly mentions addressing state-level policies and offers an ebook on the 50% Wage Rule, indicating a strong focus on statutory compliance relevant to Rajasthan's manufacturing sector. However, detailed confirmation on Section 17(2) F&F settlement timeliness is not present in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Explicitly addresses state-level policies and the 50% Wage Rule, crucial for Rajasthan.

Special note for Rajasthan

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Rajasthan.

Pros

  • Explicitly addresses state-level policies and the 50% Wage Rule, crucial for Rajasthan.
  • Offers comprehensive reporting capabilities, potentially aligning with Income Tax Act 2025 requirements.
  • Focuses on automating payroll and compliance to reduce manual errors.

Cons

  • Research does not confirm specific capabilities for the Section 17(2) 48-hour F&F settlement mandate.
  • While mentioning state-level policies, explicit configuration details for Rajasthan's PT nuances are not provided.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Rajasthan

Map PT + labour filings for Rajasthan against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Rajasthan

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Rajasthan in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Rajasthan

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Rajasthan on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Rajasthan · Manufacturing (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Rajasthan.
  • For Rajasthan shop-floor and contract labour: work orders, man-days, and alignment with state labour and welfare board norms.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Rajasthan).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Rajasthan payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Compliance in Rajasthan Manufacturing: An Audit of HR & Payroll Software (April 2026)

For manufacturing entities operating in Rajasthan, robust statutory compliance is not merely a regulatory requirement but a critical operational imperative. The transition to the April 2026 fiscal year underscores the need for HR and payroll software that can accurately navigate complex labour laws, particularly the Code on Wages, 2019, which mandates that basic salary must constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC) for in-scope wage components. This foundational principle directly impacts provident fund (PF), gratuity, and other statutory contributions. Failure to adhere to this 50% basic rule can lead to significant financial penalties and legal challenges, especially in a sector with a substantial workforce.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: Manual payroll processing and compliance management expose manufacturing units to inherent risks. Errors in calculating ESI, PF, and Professional Tax (PT) can result in underpayments or overpayments, leading to disputes and penalties. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) mandate for full-and-final (F&F) settlements within a stipulated timeframe, often interpreted as an expedited 48-hour settlement for all dues upon employee exit, demands precise and timely payroll closure. Inadequate system capabilities can delay these crucial settlements, creating employee dissatisfaction and potential legal recourse.

Rajasthan Specifics: In Rajasthan, the 50% Basic vs. CTC rule is paramount. Software solutions must be configurable to enforce this split accurately. While the research does not explicitly detail specific amendments for Rajasthan mirroring the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 or Maharashtra 50% wage impact, the general principle of state-specific PT regulations and wage structures must be addressed. Vendors claiming comprehensive India-wide compliance should demonstrate their ability to adapt to such nuances.

Digital Trust and Income Tax Act 2025: The Income Tax Act 2025 places increased emphasis on employer reporting, accurate deduction of taxes at source (TDS), and the provision of proof of investment. HR and payroll software should facilitate seamless generation of payroll reports, TDS certificates, and employee statements that align with these reporting expectations, thereby enhancing digital trust and simplifying tax compliance for both the employer and the employee.

Category Technical Maturity: 7/10. While many platforms offer core HR and payroll functionalities, deep statutory configuration and proactive updates for evolving labour laws, especially concerning wage structures and exit settlements, remain areas for enhanced maturity.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.