SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 29 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 28, 2026Updated on Data refresh28 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Meghalaya.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Meghalaya: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesNo or verify with vendor
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Meghalayabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Meghalaya · Healthcare

Best Healthcare Software in Meghalaya

515 words · keyword: Best Healthcare Software in Meghalaya

Expert verdict

This review assesses HR and payroll software for April 2026 Indian compliance, with a focus on the healthcare sector in Meghalaya. Vendors are evaluated against key statutory mandates including the 50% basic pay rule, expedited full and final settlements, and Income Tax Act, 2025 reporting.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho's comprehensive suite offers broad business solutions, but specific payroll compliance features for Indian statutory mandates, particularly the 50% basic pay rule and expedited F&F, are not detailed in the provided research excerpts. Further investigation into their dedicated payroll module is recommended.

Key tech: Broad suite of integrated business applications.

Special note for Meghalaya

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Meghalaya.

Pros

  • Broad suite of integrated business applications.
  • Focus on privacy and security.
  • Scalable for various business sizes.

Cons

  • Limited specific details on Indian payroll statutory compliance in provided excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender for HR and payroll compliance, explicitly mentioning statutory compliance with PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS. However, detailed evidence for the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate is not explicitly presented in the research excerpts.

Key tech: Explicit mention of statutory compliance including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.

Special note for Meghalaya

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Meghalaya.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of statutory compliance including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.
  • Comprehensive payroll features including F&F settlement.
  • User-friendly interface and employee self-service portal.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule adherence.
  • Specific timeline for F&F settlement (e.g., 48 hours) not detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers robust payroll and statutory compliance features, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS calculations, with a focus on automation. While it mentions F&F settlement, specific adherence to the 48-hour mandate and the 50% basic pay rule requires further verification from their documentation.

Key tech: Comprehensive statutory compliance with PF, ESI, PT, TDS.

Special note for Meghalaya

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Meghalaya.

Pros

  • Comprehensive statutory compliance with PF, ESI, PT, TDS.
  • Automated payroll processing and reporting.
  • Extensive reporting capabilities and employee self-service.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay rule.
  • Specific timeline for F&F settlement (e.g., 48 hours) not detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 3/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned for simplified payroll, but the provided excerpts lack sufficient detail regarding specific Indian statutory compliance features, such as the 50% basic pay rule or the 48-hour F&F settlement. Further investigation into their compliance modules is necessary.

Key tech: Focus on simplifying payroll processes.

Special note for Meghalaya

Map PT + labour filings for Meghalaya against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on simplifying payroll processes.
  • Integration with Razorpay's financial ecosystem.
  • Potential for streamlined payouts.

Cons

  • Limited specific details on Indian statutory compliance in provided excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of 50% basic pay rule or 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 6/10

Darwinbox highlights its India Payroll capabilities for accuracy and digitization, but the provided excerpts do not offer granular details on specific statutory compliance features like the 50% basic pay rule or the 48-hour F&F settlement. Their global positioning suggests potential, but India-specific validation is needed.

Key tech: Focus on end-to-end payroll processing for India.

Special note for Meghalaya

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Meghalaya in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Focus on end-to-end payroll processing for India.
  • Digitized and accurate payroll solutions.
  • Recognized as a Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant.

Cons

  • Lack of specific details on 50% basic pay rule adherence.
  • No explicit mention of 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 7/10

Akrivia HCM's native India payroll engine explicitly mentions calculating components like Basic, HRA, and allowances, suggesting potential for CTC structuring. However, direct confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement is not present in the provided research.

Key tech: Native India-specific payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Meghalaya

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Meghalaya on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India-specific payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance coverage (PF, ESI, PT, TDS).
  • Calculates various payroll components including Basic, HRA.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule adherence.
  • Specific timeline for F&F settlement (e.g., 48 hours) not detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Meghalaya · Healthcare (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Meghalaya.
  • For Meghalaya healthcare: shift premiums, locum/contract clinical staff, and statutory pass-through on benefit deductions.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Meghalaya).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Meghalaya payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Authority for Healthcare Sector Compliance

In April 2026, the Indian healthcare sector, like all industries, operates under a framework of stringent labour laws and payroll regulations. Ensuring compliance is paramount to avoid penalties and maintain operational integrity. Key legislation impacting HR and payroll includes the Code on Wages, 2019 (though full implementation details are subject to notification), the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. For specific state-level nuances, such as professional tax (PT) and labour welfare fund (LWF) obligations, adherence to respective state acts is critical. The Income Tax Act, 1961, with its reporting and deduction mandates, remains a cornerstone of payroll compliance.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Payroll Processing

The shift from manual payroll processing to automated HR and payroll software significantly mitigates risks associated with errors, delays, and non-compliance. Manual processes are prone to calculation mistakes in statutory deductions like Provident Fund (PF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI), leading to potential penalties. Similarly, managing contractor payments and ensuring timely remittance of Professional Tax (PT) requires meticulous tracking that is best handled by automated systems. The Code on Wages, 2019, mandates that basic salary should constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC), a complex calculation that automated systems can manage more accurately than manual methods. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (often colloquially linked to a 48-hour mandate for full and final settlements) necessitates expedited processing of all dues upon employee exit, a task that can be streamlined through integrated HRMS platforms.

Meghalaya Specifics and State Nuances

While this analysis focuses on general Indian payroll compliance, specific state regulations are crucial. For Meghalaya, specific state amendments or notifications regarding PT, LWF, or other labour welfare schemes must be verified. If the context were Karnataka, the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 would be relevant for return filing postures. If the context were Maharashtra, the Maharashtra 50% wage impact on CTC structuring would be a key consideration. For Kerala, the Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) deduction and remittance support would be a critical feature to assess. Without specific vendor documentation referencing these state-specific nuances for Meghalaya, a conservative approach is taken.

Income Tax Act, 2025 Reporting Capabilities

Modern HR and payroll software are increasingly incorporating features aligned with the Income Tax Act, 2025 (as framed for editorial purposes). This includes robust capabilities for employer reporting, accurate deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), and facilitating the submission of proof-of-investment by employees. Such features streamline tax compliance and provide audit trails for both the employer and employee.

Category Maturity: 8/10

The HR and payroll software market in India demonstrates a high degree of maturity, with vendors offering comprehensive solutions that address a wide array of statutory and operational needs. The focus on automation, cloud-based delivery, and integration capabilities signifies a well-developed ecosystem. However, continuous updates to labour laws and state-specific regulations require vendors to maintain agility.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.