SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 15 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 14, 2026Updated on Data refresh14 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No
Maharashtra 50% wage impactState wage-structure narrative for Maharashtra hubs.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Maharashtra.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Maharashtra: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Maharashtrabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Maharashtra · Retail

Best Retail Software in Maharashtra

419 words · keyword: Best Retail Software in Maharashtra

Expert verdict

For Maharashtra Retail, prioritizing software that explicitly supports the 50% Basic salary mandate and expedited full-and-final settlements is crucial for statutory compliance. Robust automation is key to mitigating risks associated with manual payroll processes and adhering to the Income Tax Act 2025 reporting requirements.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho offers a broad suite of business applications, with its payroll and finance modules potentially integrating for compliance needs. However, specific depth in Indian statutory mandates like the 50% Basic rule and expedited F&F settlement timelines requires further verification.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Maharashtra

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Potential for finance and payroll synergy.
  • Scalable for various business sizes.

Cons

  • Specific Indian statutory compliance details, particularly for Maharashtra's 50% wage impact, are not explicitly detailed in research.
  • Full-and-final settlement timeliness under Section 17(2) is not clearly addressed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka positions itself as a comprehensive HR and payroll solution with a strong emphasis on compliance across all states. Its ability to handle complex payroll calculations and manage employee lifecycle events suggests potential for addressing statutory requirements.

Key tech: Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, indicating broad compliance awareness.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, indicating broad compliance awareness.
  • Focus on payroll automation for timely payments and compliance.
  • Offers features for employee onboarding and offboarding workflows.

Cons

  • Specific details on configuring the 50% Basic salary vs. CTC for Maharashtra are not explicitly detailed in the research provided.
  • The 48-hour mandate for full-and-final settlements under Section 17(2) is not explicitly confirmed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR highlights its expertise in Indian HR and payroll compliance, explicitly mentioning the '50% Wage Rule Explained' ebook, suggesting a focus on this critical mandate. Its comprehensive reporting and state-level policy coverage are strong indicators of statutory readiness.

Key tech: Explicitly addresses the '50% Wage Rule' in its content, indicating focus on this mandate.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly addresses the '50% Wage Rule' in its content, indicating focus on this mandate.
  • Offers comprehensive reporting, including state-level policies.
  • Provides solutions for payroll compliance and exit workflows.

Cons

  • While mentioning exit workflows, the specific 48-hour timeline for full-and-final settlements under Section 17(2) is not explicitly confirmed.
  • The research does not detail specific configurations for Maharashtra's 50% wage impact beyond the general rule.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT + labour filings for Maharashtra against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Maharashtra

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Maharashtra in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Maharashtra on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Maharashtra · Retail (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Maharashtra.
  • For Maharashtra retail: rosters, shift and store-level attendance, and timely statutory pay-outs for frontline staff.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Maharashtra).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Maharashtra payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

For Retail businesses operating in Maharashtra, robust payroll and labour compliance software is not merely an operational tool but a critical pillar of statutory adherence. The evolving regulatory landscape, particularly concerning wage structures and employee exit settlements, necessitates a diligent approach to software selection. Relying on manual processes or inadequate systems introduces significant risks of non-compliance, leading to potential penalties and operational disruptions. This audit focuses on key statutory mandates effective April 2026, emphasizing the 50% Basic salary rule and the expedited Section 17(2) mandate for full-and-final settlements, alongside state-specific nuances for Maharashtra.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Retail Payroll The retail sector, often characterized by high employee turnover and diverse employment contracts, stands to gain substantially from automated compliance. Manual calculation and filing of ESI, PF, and Professional Tax (PT) for Maharashtra are prone to errors and delays. The Section 17(2) mandate, requiring all due wages upon employee exit to be settled within a stipulated timeframe (often interpreted as an expedited, near 48-hour process for full-and-final settlements), presents a significant challenge for manual systems. Failure to comply can result in penalties. Furthermore, ensuring the correct CTC split to meet the 50% Basic salary floor requires precise configuration, directly impacting PF and gratuity liabilities.

Maharashtra Specifics: Wage Impact and PT As of April 2026, the directive for Basic salary to constitute at least 50% of CTC remains a critical consideration for Maharashtra. Software solutions must demonstrably support this configuration to ensure accurate calculation of statutory contributions. While the research did not explicitly detail the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026, for Maharashtra, the focus remains on the 50% wage impact on statutory calculations. The ability to manage state-specific PT rules and filings is paramount for businesses operating within Maharashtra.

Digital Trust and the Income Tax Act 2025 The Income Tax Act 2025 framework places increased emphasis on employer reporting and accurate deduction management. Software solutions that facilitate seamless data flow for employer reporting, deductions, and proof-of-investment contribute to digital trust and compliance. This includes robust capabilities for generating accurate payroll data for tax purposes, ensuring transparency and adherence to the Act's provisions.

Category Technical Maturity: 7/10 While many HR and payroll solutions offer comprehensive features, true statutory adherence, especially concerning the nuanced mandates of the Indian labour laws and state-specific regulations, requires deep integration and demonstrable configurability. A score of 7 reflects the current market's offering, with room for enhanced clarity and explicit support for all April 2026 mandates.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.