SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 15 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 14, 2026Updated on Data refresh14 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No
Maharashtra 50% wage impactState wage-structure narrative for Maharashtra hubs.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Maharashtra.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Maharashtra: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Maharashtrabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Maharashtra · Manufacturing

Best Manufacturing Software in Maharashtra

361 words · keyword: Best Manufacturing Software in Maharashtra

Expert verdict

For manufacturing firms in Maharashtra, selecting HR and payroll software by April 2026 requires a stringent focus on statutory compliance, especially regarding the 50% basic wage rule and expedited final settlements. Automation is key to mitigating manual risks and ensuring adherence to the Income Tax Act 2025 reporting requirements.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's integrated suite offers broad business functionality, but specific payroll and compliance features for Indian manufacturing, particularly Maharashtra's nuances, require deeper validation. Its general finance and CRM capabilities suggest a foundational readiness for digital reporting.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Maharashtra

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Potential for broad financial and CRM integration.
  • Scalable for various business sizes.

Cons

  • Specific payroll compliance for Maharashtra's 50% basic wage rule is not explicitly detailed in research.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) 48-hour F&F settlement timeliness.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 6/10

Keka positions itself as a comprehensive HR and payroll solution with a strong emphasis on compliance across all states. While it claims to handle rules across 50 states, specific audit-level detail on Maharashtra's 50% basic wage rule and Section 17(2) timelines is not readily available in the provided research.

Key tech: Claims to handle compliance across all 50 states.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Claims to handle compliance across all 50 states.
  • Offers payroll automation and compliance features.
  • Focus on employee experience and HR processes.

Cons

  • Research does not confirm specific handling of Maharashtra's 50% basic wage rule.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) 48-hour F&F settlement timeliness.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR highlights its expertise in Indian payroll and compliance, explicitly mentioning the '50% Wage Rule Explained' in its resources, suggesting a focus on this critical Maharashtra mandate. Its comprehensive reporting capabilities align with the Income Tax Act 2025 requirements.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions the '50% Wage Rule Explained' in its resources.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions the '50% Wage Rule Explained' in its resources.
  • Offers extensive basic and advanced admin reports, supporting Income Tax Act 2025 reporting.
  • Strong focus on Indian payroll and compliance automation.

Cons

  • Research does not explicitly confirm Section 17(2) 48-hour F&F settlement timeliness.
  • Contractor pay handling is not detailed in the provided research.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT + labour filings for Maharashtra against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Maharashtra

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Maharashtra in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Maharashtra on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Maharashtra · Manufacturing (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Maharashtra.
  • For Maharashtra shop-floor and contract labour: work orders, man-days, and alignment with state labour and welfare board norms.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Maharashtra).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Maharashtra payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

For Manufacturing entities operating in Maharashtra, robust HR, payroll, and labour-compliance software is not merely an operational tool but a critical shield against statutory non-compliance. As of April 2026, the evolving regulatory landscape, particularly concerning wage structures and exit settlements, demands a precise, audit-minded approach to software selection. Relying on manual processes for statutory obligations such as ESI, PF, and Professional Tax (PT) introduces significant risks of errors, penalties, and reputational damage. Automation is paramount to ensure accurate calculations, timely filings, and adherence to mandates like the 50% Basic salary rule and the Section 17(2) 48-hour full-and-final settlement expectation.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: Manual payroll processing and compliance management are inherently prone to human error, leading to potential under or over-payments, incorrect statutory deductions, and delayed filings. This directly impacts employee trust and can trigger audits and penalties. For instance, incorrect configuration of the 50% Basic salary component of CTC can lead to non-compliance with the Wage Code. Similarly, delays in processing full-and-final settlements beyond the stipulated timelines can result in legal challenges. Automated systems mitigate these risks by enforcing predefined rules, ensuring data integrity, and providing audit trails for all transactions.

Maharashtra Specifics: The Maharashtra 50% wage impact necessitates careful configuration within payroll software to ensure the basic salary component meets at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC), as per the notified wage framework. This impacts PF and Gratuity calculations. Furthermore, adherence to the Section 17(2) mandate for expedited full-and-final settlements within a 48-hour window post-resignation or termination is crucial. Software solutions must be capable of triggering and processing these settlements promptly.

Digital Trust and Income Tax Act 2025: The Income Tax Act 2025 places increased emphasis on employer reporting and accurate deduction of taxes at source. Payroll software must facilitate seamless generation of reports, manage employee tax declarations, and provide proof of investment data, thereby enhancing digital trust and compliance with employer reporting obligations.

Category Technical Maturity: 8/10. The market offers sophisticated solutions, but a perfect score is reserved for systems demonstrating seamless, out-of-the-box integration with all state-specific nuances and proactive updates for emerging regulations.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.