SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No
Maharashtra 50% wage impactState wage-structure narrative for Maharashtra hubs.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Maharashtra.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Maharashtra: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Maharashtrabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Maharashtra · Hospitality

Best Hospitality Software in Maharashtra

511 words · keyword: Best Hospitality Software in Maharashtra

Expert verdict

For Maharashtra's hospitality sector, HR and payroll software must demonstrate robust capabilities in configuring the 50% basic wage component and facilitating expedited full-and-final settlements. Vendors should also offer clear pathways for compliance with Income Tax Act 2025 reporting mandates.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 6/10

Zoho's extensive suite offers a broad range of business applications, but specific payroll and deep statutory compliance features for the Indian market, particularly Maharashtra, require further detailed investigation. Its strength lies in its integrated ecosystem rather than dedicated payroll compliance.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications for holistic management.

Special note for Maharashtra

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications for holistic management.
  • Potential for customization within its broader ecosystem.
  • Scalability for diverse business needs.

Cons

  • Limited explicit detail on specific Indian payroll compliance features, especially for Maharashtra's nuances.
  • F&F settlement timeliness and specific statutory adherence are not clearly articulated in provided research.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka presents itself as a comprehensive HR and payroll solution with a stated commitment to compliance across all states. Its research highlights payroll automation and compliance as core strengths, suggesting potential for meeting Indian statutory requirements.

Key tech: Explicitly states handling rules across all 50 states, implying broad compliance.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly states handling rules across all 50 states, implying broad compliance.
  • Focus on 'perfect payroll, solid compliance' suggests an intent to meet statutory needs.
  • Offers features for timely payments and compliance.

Cons

  • Specific details on Maharashtra's 50% basic wage rule configuration are not evident.
  • F&F settlement timelines are not explicitly detailed, leaving a gap in assessing Section 17(2) adherence.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR positions itself as a full-suite HRMS with a strong emphasis on payroll compliance in India, including state-level policies. Its stated ability to handle complex policies and automate payroll processes suggests a strong foundation for meeting statutory obligations.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions 'No compliance nightmares!' and 'Payroll Compliance' as key features.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions 'No compliance nightmares!' and 'Payroll Compliance' as key features.
  • Offers 150+ reports covering state-level policies, indicating jurisdictional awareness.
  • Ebook on '50% Wage Rule Explained' suggests direct engagement with this critical mandate.

Cons

  • While the 50% wage rule is acknowledged, specific configuration details for Maharashtra's CTC split are not detailed in the excerpt.
  • The research does not explicitly confirm the software's capability to trigger F&F settlements within the expected 48-hour window post-exit.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT + labour filings for Maharashtra against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Maharashtra

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Maharashtra in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Maharashtra on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Maharashtra · Hospitality (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Maharashtra.
  • For Maharashtra hospitality: tips/service charge handling, irregular hours, and high churn exit settlements in payroll.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Maharashtra).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Maharashtra payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

For businesses operating within Maharashtra's dynamic hospitality sector, selecting the right HR, payroll, and labour-compliance software is not merely an operational choice but a critical statutory imperative. As of April 2026, the regulatory landscape demands stringent adherence to evolving labour codes, particularly concerning wage structures, timely settlements, and digital reporting. Failure to align software capabilities with these mandates exposes organizations to significant financial penalties and operational disruptions.

The Imperative of Statutory Authority in Software Selection

The hospitality industry, often characterized by a high volume of transient staff and complex shift patterns, faces unique compliance challenges. Robust software is essential to automate critical processes such as Employees' State Insurance (ESI) and Provident Fund (PF) contributions, Professional Tax (PT) remittances, and the accurate calculation of wages for contract labour. Manual processing in these areas introduces a high risk of error, leading to non-compliance and potential audits. Furthermore, the Code on Wages, 2019, mandates that basic salary must constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC) for in-scope wage components. Software must be capable of configuring CTC splits to meet this floor, preventing misclassification of allowances and ensuring accurate PF and gratuity calculations. This is a crucial consideration for Maharashtra, where specific interpretations of wage impact are paramount.

Full and Final Settlement: The 48-Hour Mandate

A significant aspect of labour law, particularly relevant to employee exits, is the timeline for full and final (F&F) settlement. Section 17(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and related interpretations, necessitate the prompt payment of all wages due upon an employee's cessation. While not explicitly a 48-hour legal mandate across all scenarios, the expectation for expedited, near-48-hour settlement of F&F payments is a best practice and a compliance risk area. Software solutions that can trigger and manage these settlements efficiently, ensuring all dues are accounted for and disbursed promptly, are vital for avoiding disputes and demonstrating good faith.

Maharashtra's Specific Wage Nuances and Digital Trust

For Maharashtra, the 50% Basic wage impact remains a key configuration point. Software must allow for precise CTC breakdowns to ensure the basic salary component meets the mandated threshold. While the research did not yield specific details on the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026, it is crucial to note that any jurisdiction-specific amendments require software to be adaptable. In parallel, the Income Tax Act 2025 continues to emphasize employer reporting and deduction capabilities. Software that facilitates accurate payroll data management, deduction tracking, and supports the necessary reporting for tax purposes, including proof of investment and tax credit management, enhances digital trust and streamlines tax compliance for both the employer and employee.

Technical Maturity Assessment

Assessing the technical maturity of HR and payroll software is crucial for ensuring it can handle the complexities of the Indian regulatory environment. For solutions offering comprehensive payroll and compliance functionalities, a technical maturity score of 8/10 is assigned, reflecting their ability to automate complex calculations, manage statutory filings, and adapt to evolving legal frameworks, though continuous updates and specific jurisdictional configurations remain key.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.