SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes
Maharashtra 50% wage impactState wage-structure narrative for Maharashtra hubs.Yes

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Maharashtra.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Maharashtra: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Maharashtrabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Maharashtra · Healthcare

Best Healthcare Software in Maharashtra

538 words · keyword: Best Healthcare Software in Maharashtra

Expert verdict

The Indian HR, payroll, and labour compliance software market demonstrates strong maturity, with vendors increasingly offering robust solutions for complex statutory mandates like the 50% basic pay rule and expedited F&F settlements. However, continuous vigilance is required to ensure adherence to evolving legislation, particularly in diverse states like Maharashtra.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, but specific details regarding its payroll and labour compliance capabilities, particularly concerning the 50% basic pay rule and expedited F&F settlements, were not sufficiently detailed in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Maharashtra

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Strong brand recognition and market presence.
  • Focus on privacy and security.

Cons

  • Limited specific evidence on payroll compliance depth in excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a robust HR, Payroll, and PSA platform with a strong emphasis on compliance across all 50 states. Its features appear to cover statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS, with explicit mention of F&F in payroll processing.

Key tech: Explicit mention of statutory compliance including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of statutory compliance including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS.
  • Payroll automation includes F&F processing.
  • User-friendly interface and all-in-one platform approach.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay rule's impact on CTC.
  • No specific callout for a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 9/10

greytHR is a well-established HRMS and Payroll software in India, explicitly mentioning 100% statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, with features for F&F settlements. Its documentation also highlights a guide on the 50% Wage Rule.

Key tech: Explicitly addresses 100% statutory compliance and F&F settlements.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly addresses 100% statutory compliance and F&F settlements.
  • Offers a guide on the 50% Wage Rule, indicating awareness of the mandate.
  • Extensive reporting capabilities and a strong focus on ESS.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.
  • While the 50% wage rule is mentioned, the specific mechanism for ensuring it within CTC configuration needs further verification.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 4/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned as a solution to simplify payroll in India, focusing on automation and compliance. However, the provided excerpts were insufficient to detail its specific capabilities regarding the 50% basic pay rule, F&F settlement timelines, or state-specific nuances.

Key tech: Focus on automation and simplification of payroll.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT + labour filings for Maharashtra against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on automation and simplification of payroll.
  • Part of a larger financial services ecosystem.
  • Aims for compliance and timely payouts.

Cons

  • Excerpts lacked specific details on statutory compliance depth.
  • No explicit mention of F&F settlement timelines or the 50% basic pay rule.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 7/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a specific focus on India, emphasizing digitization, accuracy, and audit readiness. While it mentions end-to-end payroll processing, detailed evidence on its handling of the 50% basic pay rule and specific F&F settlement timelines was not present in the provided snippets.

Key tech: Global payroll solution with India-specific focus.

Special note for Maharashtra

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Maharashtra in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Global payroll solution with India-specific focus.
  • Emphasis on digitization, accuracy, and audit readiness.
  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay rule's impact on CTC.
  • No specific callout for a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 8/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native India payroll engine with comprehensive statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and mentions FBP and auto-salary revisions, suggesting flexibility in CTC structuring. However, explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule and a 48-hour F&F timeline was not found.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Maharashtra on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance coverage.
  • Features like FBP and auto-salary revision offer flexibility in CTC.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay rule's impact on CTC.
  • No specific callout for a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Maharashtra · Healthcare (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Maharashtra.
  • For Maharashtra healthcare: shift premiums, locum/contract clinical staff, and statutory pass-through on benefit deductions.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Maharashtra).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Maharashtra payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Authority for Healthcare Sector Compliance

In April 2026, businesses operating in Maharashtra, particularly within the healthcare sector, must adhere to a complex web of labour laws. The Code on Wages, 2019, significantly impacts salary structuring by mandating that basic pay must constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC) for in-scope wage components. This directive aims to ensure a more equitable distribution of statutory contributions like Provident Fund (PF) and Gratuity. Beyond wages, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, alongside the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, remain critical. Professional Tax (PT) regulations, varying by state, also demand diligent compliance. For the healthcare sector, specific regulations concerning working hours, overtime, and employee well-being under various state-specific labour laws must also be meticulously followed. The Income Tax Act, 2025, framework necessitates robust employer reporting and deduction capabilities, especially concerning Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and proof-of-investment management.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: The Compliance Imperative

The transition from manual payroll processing to automated HR and payroll software significantly mitigates risk. Manual processes are prone to errors in calculating ESI and PF contributions, managing complex PT slabs across different municipalities, and accurately processing contractor payments. These errors can lead to substantial penalties, interest, and reputational damage. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, mandates the timely settlement of all dues upon an employee's exit. An expedited full-and-final (F&F) settlement, ideally within 48 hours, is an expectation that manual systems struggle to meet consistently. Automated solutions offer real-time tracking, accurate calculations, and streamlined offboarding workflows, thereby ensuring timely F&F settlements and reducing the risk of non-compliance.

Maharashtra Specifics: The 50% Basic Wage Impact

For Maharashtra, the 50% Basic pay rule is a paramount consideration. Employers must ensure their CTC structures are designed to meet this threshold, impacting PF and Gratuity calculations. This requires careful review of salary components and a potential restructuring of CTCs to align with the Code on Wages. The state also has its own nuances for Professional Tax, which software solutions must accommodate accurately. The Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund (LWF), where applicable, also requires specific deduction and remittance capabilities.

Income Tax Act, 2025: Digital Reporting and Declarations

The Income Tax Act, 2025, emphasizes digital reporting and transparency. HR and payroll software should facilitate seamless employer reporting of employee income, TDS deductions, and provide employees with tools for submitting investment proofs and tax declarations. This not only ensures compliance with tax regulations but also enhances employee experience by simplifying tax planning and compliance.

Category Maturity: 8/10

The HR, payroll, and labour compliance software category in India has reached a significant level of maturity. Vendors offer comprehensive solutions covering a wide array of statutory requirements, including complex state-specific regulations. The integration of AI and advanced analytics is further enhancing efficiency and predictive compliance. However, continuous updates are required to keep pace with evolving legislation, and the nuanced interpretation of certain laws, particularly the 50% basic pay rule across all in-scope components, can still present challenges. The focus on data security and localized compliance remains a key differentiator.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.