SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
← SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No
Maharashtra 50% wage impactState wage-structure narrative for Maharashtra hubs.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Maharashtra.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Maharashtra: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Maharashtrabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Maharashtra · Education

Best Education Software in Maharashtra

314 words · keyword: Best Education Software in Maharashtra

Expert verdict

For Maharashtra's education sector in April 2026, HR and payroll software must prioritize robust statutory compliance, particularly concerning the 50% Basic salary mandate and expedited full-and-final settlements. Vendors demonstrating clear capabilities in automating these critical areas and adapting to specific state regulations offer the most defensible solutions.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's broad suite offers potential for integrated HR and payroll functions, but specific statutory compliance details for Maharashtra's education sector, particularly the 50% Basic mandate and F&F timelines, require direct verification. The platform's general finance and tax capabilities suggest a foundation for GST and ESI/PF, but explicit coverage for all April 2026 mandates is not evident from public materials.

Key tech: Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, potentially allowing for integrated HR and finance workflows.

Special note for Maharashtra

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, potentially allowing for integrated HR and finance workflows.
  • Strong general capabilities in financial management and tax compliance, likely supporting GST and ESI/PF.
  • Scalable for businesses of various sizes, from startups to enterprises.

Cons

  • Specific details on configuring the 50% Basic vs CTC mandate for Maharashtra are not readily available.
  • No explicit mention of expedited full-and-final settlement timelines aligning with Section 17(2) mandates.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka positions itself strongly on payroll compliance across all states, indicating a potential fit for Maharashtra's requirements, including ESI/PF and PT. However, explicit confirmation of its ability to enforce the 50% Basic vs CTC rule and meet the 48-hour F&F settlement expectation under Section 17(2) is necessary for a definitive audit. Its broad compliance coverage is a positive indicator.

Key tech: Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, suggesting a strong foundation for state-specific payroll compliance.

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, suggesting a strong foundation for state-specific payroll compliance.
  • Automates payroll processes to ensure accurate and timely payments while maintaining compliance.
  • Offers features for employee onboarding and offboarding, which are critical for F&F processes.

Cons

  • Direct evidence of configuring the 50% Basic vs CTC mandate for Maharashtra is not presented in the provided excerpts.
  • The specific timeline for full-and-final settlements, particularly adherence to the 48-hour expectation under Section 17(2), requires explicit vendor confirmation.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR explicitly addresses the '50% Wage Rule Explained' in its materials, indicating a direct focus on the critical Basic vs CTC configuration for Maharashtra. Its comprehensive compliance features, including ESI/PF and PT, along with an offboarding/exit workflow, suggest a strong potential for meeting statutory demands. Verification of its F&F settlement timeliness is key.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions and explains the '50% Wage Rule', indicating strong support for the Basic vs CTC mandate.

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Maharashtra.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions and explains the '50% Wage Rule', indicating strong support for the Basic vs CTC mandate.
  • Offers robust payroll compliance features, including ESI, PF, and state-level policies.
  • Includes an offboarding/exit workflow, crucial for managing full-and-final settlements.

Cons

  • While an exit workflow is mentioned, specific details on the 48-hour mandate for full-and-final settlements under Section 17(2) require direct confirmation.
  • The provided excerpts do not detail specific capabilities for Income Tax Act 2025 reporting beyond general payroll reporting.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Maharashtra

Map PT + labour filings for Maharashtra against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Maharashtra

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Maharashtra in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Maharashtra

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Maharashtra on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Maharashtra · Education (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Maharashtra.
  • For Maharashtra education: seasonal hiring, stipends vs wages, and clear PF/PT treatment across teaching and ops staff.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Maharashtra).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Maharashtra payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Jump to

Navigating Maharashtra's Education Sector: Statutory Compliance in HR & Payroll Software (April 2026)

Navigating Maharashtra's Education Sector: Statutory Compliance in HR & Payroll Software (April 2026)

For educational institutions in Maharashtra operating under the dynamic Indian regulatory landscape of April 2026, selecting HR and payroll software is not merely an operational choice but a critical statutory imperative. Robust compliance capabilities are paramount to mitigate risks associated with complex labour laws, ensuring accurate wage computation, timely statutory remittances, and lawful employee exits. The 50% Basic salary mandate under the Wage Code, requiring basic pay to constitute at least half of the Cost-to-Company (CTC) for in-scope wage components, necessitates software that can precisely configure and validate salary structures. Failure to adhere can lead to significant penalties and reputational damage.

Automation versus manual processes presents a stark risk-reward dichotomy. Manual handling of ESI, PF, Professional Tax (PT), and contractor payments is prone to errors, delays, and non-compliance. This is particularly acute for full-and-final (F&F) settlements, where the Section 17(2) framework, often interpreted as a 48-hour mandate for expedited settlement of all dues upon employee exit, demands swift and accurate processing. Software that automates these workflows reduces the potential for disputes and ensures adherence to statutory timelines.

Maharashtra-specific considerations are crucial. The Maharashtra 50% wage impact on CTC configuration must be a core feature, allowing for precise structuring of salaries to meet the 50% Basic requirement. While this page context focuses on Maharashtra, it's noted that for other jurisdictions, specific amendments like the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 would necessitate distinct handling. Furthermore, under the Income Tax Act 2025, robust capabilities for employer reporting, accurate deduction management, and facilitating proof-of-investment are essential for maintaining digital trust and compliance. The ability to generate comprehensive payroll data reports is key.

Category Technical Maturity: 8/10. The market offers mature solutions for core payroll and HR functions, with increasing sophistication in compliance automation and reporting, though nuanced statutory interpretations still require careful vendor vetting.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.