SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 29 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 28, 2026Updated on Data refresh28 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes
Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF)Confirm current slabs and due dates on official sources; payroll should support Kerala LWF deductions and remittance evidence.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Kerala.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Kerala: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Keralabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Kerala · BFSI

Best BFSI Software in Kerala

553 words · keyword: Best BFSI Software in Kerala

Expert verdict

BFSI entities in Kerala require payroll solutions that meticulously adhere to the 50% Basic pay mandate and the expedited Section 17(2) exit settlement timeline. Vendors must demonstrate robust support for Kerala-specific compliances like LWF and integrate with Income Tax Act, 2025 reporting requirements for comprehensive digital trust.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho's broad suite offers potential for payroll integration, but specific details on its statutory compliance depth for India, particularly the 50% basic pay rule and exit settlements, are not evident in the provided research. Further due diligence is required.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Kerala

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Kerala.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Strong brand recognition and established presence.
  • Focus on privacy and security.

Cons

  • Lack of specific payroll compliance details in research excerpts.
  • No clear evidence of support for Section 17(2) exit wage timelines.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a comprehensive HR and payroll solution with explicit mentions of statutory compliance, including LWF, PT, PF, and ESI. Its features suggest a strong foundation for meeting the 50% basic pay mandate and tax reporting requirements.

Key tech: Explicit mention of 'Statutory Compliance' including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS, PT.

Special note for Kerala

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Kerala.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of 'Statutory Compliance' including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS, PT.
  • Features like 'F&F Settlement' and 'Employee Tax Management' are highlighted.
  • Supports state-level compliance and tax declarations.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) exit wages.
  • Specific configuration for the 50% basic pay rule requires verification.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers a robust payroll solution with strong emphasis on statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and LWF calculations. Its comprehensive reporting and ESS portal are beneficial for BFSI entities, though specific confirmation on the 48-hour F&F settlement is needed.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions 'Statutory Compliance' and 'Labour Welfare Fund calculation and deductions'.

Special note for Kerala

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Kerala.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions 'Statutory Compliance' and 'Labour Welfare Fund calculation and deductions'.
  • Provides 'F&F Settlement' and comprehensive statutory reports.
  • Supports state-specific PT rules and has a strong focus on automation.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) exit wages.
  • While LWF is mentioned, specific Kerala LWF integration needs explicit verification.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 3/10

RazorpayX Payroll, as part of Razorpay's financial services suite, is expected to offer strong compliance features. However, the provided research excerpts are insufficient to ascertain its specific capabilities regarding the 50% basic pay rule, Section 17(2), or Kerala LWF.

Key tech: Part of a broader financial services ecosystem.

Special note for Kerala

Map PT + labour filings for Kerala against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Part of a broader financial services ecosystem.
  • Likely to have strong integration with payment processing.
  • Focus on automation and ease of use.

Cons

  • Research excerpts are too limited to assess specific payroll compliance features.
  • No information on Section 17(2) or state-specific compliances like Kerala LWF.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 5/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a specific mention of 'India Payroll' and '100% accuracy'. While it aims for end-to-end payroll processing, detailed evidence of its adherence to the 50% basic pay rule, Section 17(2) timelines, or Kerala LWF is not present in the provided snippets.

Key tech: Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions.

Special note for Kerala

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Kerala in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions.
  • Focus on digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll.
  • Global payroll capabilities with India-specific focus.

Cons

  • Lack of specific details on statutory compliance for the 50% basic pay rule.
  • No mention of Section 17(2) exit wage timelines or Kerala LWF.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 7/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native Indian payroll engine with explicit support for statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and mentions 'Tax Declaration' and 'FBP' which are relevant to the Income Tax Act, 2025. Verification of its 50% basic pay configuration and Section 17(2) adherence is recommended.

Key tech: Native Indian Payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Kerala

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Kerala on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native Indian Payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance coverage including PF, ESI, PT, TDS.
  • Features like 'Tax Declaration' and 'FBP' support Income Tax Act, 2025 requirements.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) exit wages.
  • Specific support for Kerala LWF needs to be confirmed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Kerala · BFSI (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Kerala.
  • For Kerala BFSI: branch roll-ups, variable pay vs fixed, and audit-grade statutory logs for regulators and internal risk.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Kerala).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Kerala payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Authority for BFSI Compliance

The Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) sector in India operates under a stringent regulatory framework. For April 2026, adherence to the Code on Wages, 2019, and its associated rules, particularly concerning the 50% Basic salary floor within CTC, remains paramount. This directive mandates that basic wages should not fall below 50% of the total cost to the company (CTC), impacting provident fund (PF), gratuity, and other statutory contributions. Beyond wage structuring, compliance extends to timely remittances, accurate reporting, and robust data security, especially critical for BFSI entities handling sensitive financial information. The Income Tax Act, 2025, further shapes employer obligations regarding tax deductions, employer reporting, and the facilitation of employee investment proof submissions, underscoring the need for integrated payroll solutions.

Automation vs. Manual Risk

Manual payroll processing in the BFSI sector presents significant risks, including calculation errors, missed remittances, and non-compliance with evolving labour laws. Automation is key to mitigating these risks. This includes accurate calculation and timely deposit of Employee Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI) contributions, adherence to Professional Tax (PT) regulations across various states, and compliant management of contractor payments. The Code on Wages also emphasizes the importance of clear and transparent wage components. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, mandates the settlement of all dues upon an employee's exit within a specified timeframe, often interpreted as a 48-hour window for full and final (F&F) settlements. Failure to comply can result in penalties and reputational damage. Automated systems ensure that all components of F&F, including accrued leave, unpaid wages, and statutory dues, are calculated and disbursed promptly and accurately, minimizing the risk of disputes and legal challenges.

Kerala Specifics

For businesses operating in Kerala, specific state-level compliance requirements must be integrated into payroll processes. This includes the management and remittance of the Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF). Software solutions must demonstrate explicit support for Kerala's LWF regulations, including accurate deduction calculations based on wage slabs and timely remittance to the designated authorities. Failure to address these state-specific nuances can lead to non-compliance penalties. While the broader national mandates like the 50% basic pay rule apply, the operationalization of these and other compliances requires a nuanced understanding of Kerala's legislative landscape.

Income Tax Act, 2025 and Digital Trust

The Income Tax Act, 2025, reinforces the need for digital trust in payroll operations. Employers are obligated to accurately report TDS, manage employee tax declarations, and facilitate the submission of proofs for investments and deductions. Payroll software that offers robust features for managing these aspects, including generating Form 16 and Form 24Q, and providing employees with self-service portals for tax-related information, enhances transparency and compliance. This digital infrastructure is crucial for building trust and ensuring that all payroll-related financial transactions are auditable and compliant with the latest tax regulations.

Category Maturity: 8/10

The HR and payroll software market in India demonstrates a high degree of maturity, with vendors offering comprehensive solutions that address complex statutory requirements. The integration of AI and advanced automation is becoming standard, enabling businesses to navigate intricate compliance landscapes with greater efficiency and accuracy. However, continuous updates to legislation and the need for state-specific customization mean that vigilance and ongoing vendor support remain critical.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.