SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 22 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 21, 2026Updated on Data refresh21 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes
Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026Deemed filing / PT posture for Karnataka hubs.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Karnataka.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Karnataka: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
DarwinboxYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Karnatakabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Karnataka · Construction

Best Construction Software in Karnataka

512 words · keyword: Best Construction Software in Karnataka

Expert verdict

The Indian HR and payroll software landscape in April 2026 offers robust solutions for the construction sector, emphasizing statutory compliance and automation. Vendors demonstrate varying degrees of support for the 50% basic pay mandate and specific state regulations, with a clear trend towards simplifying complex compliance for employers.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's extensive suite offers broad business functionality but lacks specific detail on granular payroll compliance features within the provided research excerpts. Further investigation into Zoho Payroll's specific statutory capabilities is recommended.

Key tech: Comprehensive business software suite

Special note for Karnataka

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Karnataka.

Pros

  • Comprehensive business software suite
  • Strong brand recognition
  • Potential for integration with other Zoho products

Cons

  • Limited specific details on payroll statutory compliance in research
  • No direct mention of F&F settlement timelines

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender with explicit mentions of statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS, and features like F&F settlement. Its focus on automation and ease of use is a significant advantage for construction sector payroll.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, LWF, TDS)

Special note for Karnataka

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Karnataka.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, LWF, TDS)
  • Supports F&F settlement and employee exit processes
  • Automated payroll calculations and reporting

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate
  • Specific support for 50% basic pay vs CTC structure not detailed

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 9/10

greytHR offers a mature HRMS and payroll solution with strong emphasis on statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and detailed reporting capabilities. Its comprehensive approach to payroll processing and employee self-service is beneficial for the construction industry.

Key tech: Comprehensive statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, PT, TDS)

Special note for Karnataka

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Karnataka.

Pros

  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, PT, TDS)
  • Detailed reporting and analytics
  • Robust employee self-service portal

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate
  • Specifics on 50% basic pay vs CTC configuration not detailed

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 6/10

RazorpayX Payroll, though not fully detailed in the provided excerpts, is positioned as a payroll solution focused on payouts and statutory framing. Its integration with Razorpay's payment ecosystem suggests potential for streamlined F&F settlements.

Key tech: Focus on payouts and statutory framing

Special note for Karnataka

Map PT + labour filings for Karnataka against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on payouts and statutory framing
  • Integration with Razorpay's financial ecosystem
  • Potential for streamlined F&F settlements

Cons

  • Limited specific details on statutory compliance features in research
  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 7/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a specific India Payroll module, emphasizing digitization, accuracy, and audit readiness. While its broad capabilities are evident, specific granularities on the 50% basic pay mandate and F&F timelines require further validation.

Key tech: Digitized and accurate end-to-end payroll processing

Special note for Karnataka

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Karnataka in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Digitized and accurate end-to-end payroll processing
  • Audit-ready platform
  • Specific India Payroll module

Cons

  • Limited specific details on 50% basic pay vs CTC structure
  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 9/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native Indian payroll engine with comprehensive statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and features for managing salary components and tax declarations. Its in-house precision and real-time updates are key strengths for construction sector payroll.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates

Special note for Karnataka

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Karnataka on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance coverage (PF, ESI, PT, TDS)
  • Features for managing salary components and tax declarations

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate
  • Specifics on 50% basic pay vs CTC configuration not detailed

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Karnataka · Construction (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Karnataka.
  • For Karnataka construction: contractor ledgers, site rolls, and labour-welfare / BOCW-aligned pay evidence trails.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Karnataka).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Karnataka payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Authority for Construction Sector Compliance

In April 2026, the Indian construction sector, like all industries, operates under a framework of evolving labour laws and payroll regulations. Key among these are the Code on Wages, 2019, which mandates a minimum of 50% of Cost-to-Company (CTC) as basic salary, impacting PF, Gratuity, and other statutory contributions. The Code on Social Security, 2020, consolidates various social security laws, including ESI and PF. Furthermore, Section 17(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and related labour laws dictate the timeline for full and final (F&F) settlements, generally expecting expedited processing. Specific state legislations, such as those pertaining to Professional Tax (PT) and Labour Welfare Fund (LWF), add layers of complexity. The Income Tax Act, 2025, continues to drive employer reporting obligations, TDS compliance, and the management of employee tax declarations and proofs of investment.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Payroll and Compliance

Manual payroll processing in the construction sector presents significant risks. These include errors in calculating ESI and PF contributions due to fluctuating daily wages or contract labour, incorrect Professional Tax deductions across different states, and delays in contractor payments, potentially leading to non-compliance. The critical Section 17(2) mandate for full and final settlements requires meticulous and timely processing of all dues upon an employee's exit. Automation through robust HR and payroll software is paramount to mitigate these risks, ensuring accuracy, adherence to statutory timelines, and reduced administrative burden. This is especially vital for construction projects, which often involve a transient workforce and complex wage structures.

Karnataka Specifics and State Nuances

For businesses operating in Karnataka, the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 (if enacted and in force) may introduce new nuances for Professional Tax return filing and remittance. Vendors must demonstrate support for state-specific PT regulations. If the context were Maharashtra, the Maharashtra 50% wage impact would be a critical consideration for CTC structuring. For Kerala, the support for Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) deductions and remittances is a key compliance indicator. The ability of software to adapt to these state-level variations is crucial for pan-India operations.

Income Tax Act, 2025: Reporting and Declarations

The Income Tax Act, 2025, places a strong emphasis on employer reporting responsibilities. Software solutions must facilitate the accurate calculation and deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), manage employee tax declarations, and support the submission of proofs of investment. The ability to generate necessary reports for tax filings, such as Form 24Q and Form 16, is a core requirement. Digital reporting capabilities are increasingly becoming standard, allowing for seamless integration with tax authorities' portals.

Category Maturity: 9/10

The HR and payroll software market in India demonstrates a high level of maturity, with vendors offering comprehensive solutions that address complex statutory requirements. The focus has shifted from basic payroll processing to end-to-end HR lifecycle management, incorporating advanced compliance features, AI-driven insights, and seamless integration capabilities. The primary challenge remains ensuring granular adherence to all state-specific nuances and the ever-evolving interpretations of labour codes.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.