SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 29 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 28, 2026Updated on Data refresh28 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Haryana.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Haryana: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Haryanabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Haryana · Manufacturing

Best Manufacturing Software in Haryana

452 words · keyword: Best Manufacturing Software in Haryana

Expert verdict

The Indian HR and payroll software market offers robust solutions for manufacturing compliance in Haryana, with a strong emphasis on the 50% basic pay mandate and expedited F&F settlements. Vendors demonstrate varying degrees of support for state-specific nuances and digital tax reporting, making careful selection critical for April 2026 readiness.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's extensive suite offers broad business functionality, but specific payroll compliance details, especially concerning the 50% basic pay rule and expedited F&F settlements, require deeper investigation. Its integrated approach is a potential strength for unified HR operations.

Key tech: Comprehensive suite of business applications

Special note for Haryana

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Haryana.

Pros

  • Comprehensive suite of business applications
  • Integrated platform for various HR functions
  • Strong brand recognition and global presence

Cons

  • Limited specific evidence on 50% basic pay compliance in research excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of 48-hour F&F settlement support.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender for HR and payroll compliance, highlighting statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS. Its focus on automation and state-level compliance is promising, though direct confirmation of the 50% basic pay rule and 48-hour F&F settlement needs further verification.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features like PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.

Special note for Haryana

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Haryana.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features like PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.
  • Automated payroll calculations and filing-ready reports.
  • Supports various workforce types, including contract labour implicitly.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay vs CTC rule.
  • No specific callout for 48-hour F&F settlement timeline support.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers a comprehensive payroll solution with a strong emphasis on statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and claims to handle complex use cases. While it mentions F&F settlements, the specific 48-hour mandate and the 50% basic pay rule require direct confirmation.

Key tech: Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PT with state-specific rules.

Special note for Haryana

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Haryana.

Pros

  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PT with state-specific rules.
  • Handles complex payroll use cases including F&F settlements.
  • Extensive reporting capabilities and ESS portal for transparency.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay vs CTC rule.
  • While F&F is mentioned, the 48-hour timeline is not explicitly stated.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 4/10

RazorpayX Payroll aims to simplify payroll with automation and compliance features. However, the provided research is limited, lacking specific details on its adherence to the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate. Further due diligence is required.

Key tech: Focus on automation for payroll processing.

Special note for Haryana

Map PT + labour filings for Haryana against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on automation for payroll processing.
  • Integrated with Razorpay's payment ecosystem.
  • Claims to simplify complex payroll.

Cons

  • Research excerpts are insufficient to confirm 50% basic pay compliance.
  • No explicit mention of 48-hour F&F settlement support.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 6/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with an emphasis on accuracy and audit readiness for India. Specifics regarding the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement timeline are not detailed in the provided excerpts, necessitating further vendor inquiry.

Key tech: Focus on digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll.

Special note for Haryana

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Haryana in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Focus on digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll.
  • Global payroll capabilities with India-specific solutions.
  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions.

Cons

  • Lack of explicit detail on the 50% basic pay vs CTC compliance.
  • No specific mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 8/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native Indian payroll engine with robust statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and explicitly mentions calculating components like Basic, HRA, and allowances. While it supports F&F settlements, the 48-hour mandate and the precise configuration for the 50% basic pay rule require validation.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Haryana

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Haryana on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Explicitly calculates components like Basic, HRA, allowances.
  • Supports F&F settlements and other complex payroll scenarios.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% basic pay vs CTC rule.
  • While F&F is mentioned, the 48-hour timeline is not explicitly stated.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Haryana · Manufacturing (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Haryana.
  • For Haryana shop-floor and contract labour: work orders, man-days, and alignment with state labour and welfare board norms.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Haryana).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Haryana payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Statutory Authority for Manufacturing in Haryana

For manufacturing entities operating in Haryana, adherence to India's labour laws is paramount. As of April 2026, the Code on Wages, 2019, remains a cornerstone, mandating specific wage structures. The critical stipulation that basic salary must constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC) is a primary compliance focus. This framework aims to ensure a foundational level of wages, impacting provident fund (PF) and gratuity calculations. Beyond wages, the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI) and the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF) govern social security contributions for eligible employees. Professional Tax (PT) obligations, varying by state, also require diligent management. For manufacturing, the complexity is amplified by a potentially diverse workforce, including contract labourers, necessitating precise compliance across all categories.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: The Compliance Imperative

Manual payroll processing in the manufacturing sector, particularly in Haryana, presents significant risks. Errors in calculating ESI and PF contributions, incorrect PT deductions across different employee categories, and non-compliance with labour regulations can lead to substantial penalties and legal disputes. The Code on Wages' emphasis on the 50% basic salary rule requires robust system capabilities to accurately split CTC components. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, mandates the settlement of all dues, including full and final (F&F) settlements, within a stipulated timeframe, often interpreted as a 48-hour window. Manual processes are prone to delays, increasing the risk of non-compliance with this expedited settlement expectation. Automated HR and payroll solutions are essential to mitigate these risks, ensuring accuracy, timeliness, and adherence to all statutory mandates.

Haryana Specifics and Broader Compliance

While the core Indian labour laws apply nationwide, specific interpretations and administrative nuances can exist at the state level. For Haryana, ensuring that payroll software correctly applies state-specific PT rates and any local labour welfare fund (LWF) requirements, if applicable, is crucial. The Code on Wages provides a unified framework, but vendors must demonstrate their ability to configure and manage these state-specific variations effectively. The drive towards digitisation, underscored by the Income Tax Act, 2025, also necessitates that payroll systems support accurate employer reporting, deduction management, and the facilitation of proof-of-investment submissions, thereby streamlining tax compliance.

Category Maturity: 9/10

The HR and payroll software market in India demonstrates high maturity, with vendors offering comprehensive solutions that address complex statutory requirements. The focus on automation, AI-driven insights, and a unified platform approach indicates a sophisticated ecosystem designed to meet the evolving compliance landscape. The ability to handle intricate wage structures, state-specific regulations, and digital reporting requirements positions the category well for businesses, including those in manufacturing.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.