SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Haryana.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Haryana: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Haryanabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Haryana · Healthcare

Best Healthcare Software in Haryana

371 words · keyword: Best Healthcare Software in Haryana

Expert verdict

Selecting HR and payroll software for Haryana's healthcare sector demands rigorous adherence to the April 2026 statutory landscape, particularly the 50% Basic salary rule and expedited F&F settlements. Vendors must demonstrate robust automation for ESI, PF, and PT, alongside capabilities aligned with the Income Tax Act 2025 for enhanced digital trust.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho's integrated suite offers broad business application capabilities, but specific, deep-dive statutory compliance for Haryana's complex payroll and labour laws, particularly concerning the 50% Basic rule and F&F timelines, is not explicitly detailed in available research.

Key tech: Comprehensive suite of business applications for integrated operations.

Special note for Haryana

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Haryana.

Pros

  • Comprehensive suite of business applications for integrated operations.
  • Potential for customization to meet specific business needs.
  • Strong brand recognition in the broader software market.

Cons

  • Limited explicit research on deep statutory payroll compliance for Haryana.
  • F&F settlement timeliness and Section 17(2) adherence not clearly defined.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka positions itself strongly on payroll compliance across all states, suggesting a capacity for statutory adherence, though specific audit-level detail on Haryana's 50% Basic rule and Section 17(2) F&F timelines requires direct verification.

Key tech: Claims comprehensive compliance handling across all 50 states.

Special note for Haryana

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Haryana.

Pros

  • Claims comprehensive compliance handling across all 50 states.
  • Offers integrated HR and payroll functionalities.
  • Focus on automation for payroll processes.

Cons

  • Specific research on Haryana's 50% Basic vs. CTC configuration is absent.
  • Explicit mention of Section 17(2) F&F settlement within 48 hours is not found.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR highlights its expertise in Indian payroll compliance and offers an ebook on the 50% Wage Rule, indicating a strong focus on statutory requirements, but detailed validation for Haryana's specific nuances and Section 17(2) F&F timelines is pending.

Key tech: Explicitly addresses the 50% Wage Rule, suggesting configuration capability.

Special note for Haryana

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Haryana.

Pros

  • Explicitly addresses the 50% Wage Rule, suggesting configuration capability.
  • Offers comprehensive HRMS and payroll solutions for India.
  • Provides detailed reports covering state-level policies.

Cons

  • Research does not confirm Section 17(2) F&F settlement within 48 hours.
  • Specific audit-level confirmation for Haryana's 50% Basic vs. CTC configuration requires further diligence.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Haryana

Map PT + labour filings for Haryana against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Haryana

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Haryana in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Haryana

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Haryana on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Haryana · Healthcare (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Haryana.
  • For Haryana healthcare: shift premiums, locum/contract clinical staff, and statutory pass-through on benefit deductions.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Haryana).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Haryana payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

For organizations operating in Haryana's dynamic healthcare sector, robust HR, payroll, and labour-compliance software is not merely an operational tool but a critical safeguard against statutory liabilities. As of April 2026, stringent regulations, including the foundational principles of the Wage Code, necessitate meticulous attention to detail. The 50% Basic salary rule mandates that the basic component of an employee's Cost to Company (CTC) must constitute at least half of the total wage, impacting provident fund (PF) and gratuity calculations. Failure to adhere to this can lead to significant financial penalties and reputational damage. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) mandate for full-and-final (F&F) settlements requires that all dues be cleared promptly, often framed as an expectation for expedited 48-hour settlements upon employee exit. This requires systems capable of rapid, accurate calculation and disbursement.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: Manual processing of ESI, PF, Professional Tax (PT), and F&F settlements in Haryana introduces a high risk of errors, non-compliance, and delays. Automated solutions mitigate these risks by ensuring calculations are consistently applied according to the latest statutory frameworks. For Haryana, specific attention must be paid to the state's Professional Tax regulations. While the research does not explicitly detail the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 or Maharashtra 50% wage impact in relation to Haryana, any payroll solution must demonstrate flexibility to adapt to evolving state-specific compliance nuances. The Income Tax Act 2025 also places increased emphasis on employer reporting, deductions, and the verification of proof-of-investment, underscoring the need for software that facilitates accurate and auditable payroll data management.

Haryana Specifics & Digital Trust: The core requirement of 50% Basic vs. CTC is a foundational audit point for any payroll system intended for Haryana. The system must allow for granular configuration of CTC components to meet this threshold. For digital trust, capabilities related to the Income Tax Act 2025, such as robust employer reporting and the management of employee tax declarations and proofs, are paramount. This ensures transparency and compliance with evolving tax regulations.

Category Technical Maturity: 8/10. The market offers sophisticated solutions, but achieving perfect statutory alignment across all jurisdictions and evolving regulations remains an ongoing challenge, necessitating continuous vendor updates and client diligence.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.