SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 22 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 21, 2026Updated on Data refresh21 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Haryana.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Haryana: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Haryanabuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Haryana · Construction

Best Construction Software in Haryana

614 words · keyword: Best Construction Software in Haryana

Expert verdict

The reviewed HR and payroll software solutions offer varying degrees of support for the construction sector's complex compliance needs. Vendors demonstrating robust automation for PF, ESI, PT, and F&F settlements, alongside clear adherence to the 50% Basic wage mandate, are preferable. Thorough due diligence on state-specific nuances and the Income Tax Act 2025 reporting capabilities is essential for robust compliance.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's comprehensive suite offers broad HR functionalities, but specific details on construction sector compliance and the 50% Basic wage mandate are not evident in the provided research. Further investigation into Zoho Payroll's specific statutory capabilities is recommended.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Haryana

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Haryana.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Strong brand recognition and user base.
  • Potential for customization across modules.

Cons

  • Lack of explicit detail on construction-specific compliance in research excerpts.
  • No clear evidence of adherence to the 50% Basic pay mandate.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender with explicit mentions of statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS. Its payroll automation and F&F settlement features are promising, though direct confirmation on the 50% Basic wage floor requires verification.

Key tech: Explicit mention of statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, LWF, TDS).

Special note for Haryana

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Haryana.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of statutory compliance features (PF, ESI, LWF, TDS).
  • Automated payroll calculations and F&F settlement capabilities.
  • Comprehensive HRMS features beyond payroll.

Cons

  • No direct evidence of adherence to the 50% Basic pay mandate.
  • Specific construction sector nuances not detailed in excerpts.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers a comprehensive payroll solution with strong emphasis on statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, with state-specific rules. Its F&F settlement and reporting capabilities are robust, but explicit confirmation on the 50% Basic wage floor is needed.

Key tech: Extensive statutory compliance features, including state-specific PT.

Special note for Haryana

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Haryana.

Pros

  • Extensive statutory compliance features, including state-specific PT.
  • Automated payroll processing with F&F settlement support.
  • Robust reporting and ESS portal for transparency.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% Basic pay mandate in research excerpts.
  • Construction sector specific features not detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 4/10

RazorpayX Payroll, while a strong player in payouts, lacks sufficient detail in the provided research regarding its specific statutory compliance features for PF, ESI, and the 50% Basic wage mandate. Its focus appears to be more on payment processing than deep statutory payroll adherence.

Key tech: Strong capabilities in payouts and payment processing.

Special note for Haryana

Map PT + labour filings for Haryana against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong capabilities in payouts and payment processing.
  • Integration potential with Razorpay's financial ecosystem.
  • Modern interface and user experience.

Cons

  • Insufficient detail on PF, ESI, and PT compliance in research.
  • No explicit mention of the 50% Basic pay mandate or F&F settlement timelines.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 6/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a focus on accuracy and digitization for India. While it mentions end-to-end payroll processing, specific details on the 50% Basic wage mandate and explicit construction sector compliance are not clear from the research.

Key tech: Digitized and accurate payroll processing.

Special note for Haryana

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Haryana in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Digitized and accurate payroll processing.
  • Global payroll capabilities with India focus.
  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM.

Cons

  • Lack of explicit detail on the 50% Basic wage mandate.
  • Specific construction sector compliance features are not detailed in excerpts.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 7/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native India payroll engine with comprehensive statutory compliance features, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and mentions calculating various salary components. Direct confirmation on the 50% Basic wage mandate and specific F&F timeline adherence is required.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Haryana

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Haryana on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance for PF, ESI, PT, TDS.
  • Calculates various salary components including Basic, HRA.

Cons

  • No explicit confirmation of the 50% Basic pay mandate in research excerpts.
  • Specific details on Section 17(2) F&F timeline adherence are not provided.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Haryana · Construction (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Haryana.
  • For Haryana construction: contractor ledgers, site rolls, and labour-welfare / BOCW-aligned pay evidence trails.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Haryana).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Haryana payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

April 2026 HR, Payroll & Labour Compliance Software: Construction Sector Focus

Statutory Authority for Construction in India

The construction sector in India operates under a complex web of labour laws and regulations designed to protect workers and ensure fair employment practices. Key among these are the Code on Wages, 2019, which mandates a minimum wage and dictates the structure of wages, including the 50% Basic salary component of CTC. This is crucial for calculating statutory contributions like Provident Fund (PF) and Gratuity. The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI) and the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF) are fundamental for social security. Additionally, Professional Tax (PT) regulations vary by state, requiring specific compliance. For contract labour, the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, imposes distinct obligations on principal employers regarding registration, welfare, and timely payments. The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, also govern employment terms and termination settlements. The Income Tax Act, 2025 (as it would be framed in April 2026) mandates employer reporting of employee income, deductions, and tax liabilities, including TDS. Ensuring robust software support for these diverse and evolving statutory requirements is paramount for construction firms.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Construction Payroll

Manual payroll processing in the construction industry presents significant risks. Errors in calculating PF, ESI, and PT contributions due to fluctuating daily wages, overtime, or contract worker engagement can lead to substantial penalties and legal disputes. The Code on Wages, 2019, with its emphasis on the 50% Basic salary floor, necessitates precise CTC structuring and payslip generation to avoid non-compliance. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (as interpreted for F&F settlements), mandates that all wages due upon an employee's exit must be settled promptly, ideally within 48 hours. Manual processes often delay Full and Final (F&F) settlements, exposing the employer to legal repercussions. Automation through specialized HR and payroll software mitigates these risks by ensuring accurate, real-time calculations, timely statutory filings, and streamlined F&F processes, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing the potential for costly errors.

Haryana Specifics and State Nuances

While this analysis focuses on general Indian statutory compliance, specific states may have unique amendments or interpretations. For instance, if the context were Karnataka, the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 would be relevant for professional tax filing postures. If the context were Maharashtra, the Maharashtra 50% wage impact on CTC structuring would be a key consideration. For Kerala, support for Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) deductions and remittances is a critical compliance factor. For the construction sector in Haryana, adherence to the Code on Wages, PF, ESI, and PT is essential. Software solutions must demonstrate flexibility to accommodate state-specific PT rates and any other localized labour law nuances.

Income Tax Act 2025 and Digital Reporting

The Income Tax Act, 2025 (hypothetical framing for April 2026) places increasing emphasis on digital reporting and transparency. Employers are expected to facilitate accurate employee tax declarations, proof of investment submissions, and timely TDS remittances. Payroll software that integrates these functionalities, provides clear reporting for Form 16, Form 24Q, and supports digital proof submission, significantly reduces the compliance burden and enhances the employee experience. This digital trust is vital for both employer and employee.

Category Maturity /10

8/10 - The market offers robust solutions with advanced features for statutory compliance, automation, and employee self-service. However, the dynamic nature of labour laws and the specific complexities of the construction sector (e.g., contract labour management, variable wages) mean continuous updates and a deep understanding of regional nuances are critical. Vendors demonstrating proactive updates and clear articulation of their compliance frameworks are best positioned.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.