SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 15 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 14, 2026Updated on Data refresh14 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Gujarat.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Gujarat: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Gujaratbuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Gujarat · IT

Best IT Software in Gujarat

500 words · keyword: Best IT Software in Gujarat

Expert verdict

Vendors in the Indian HR and payroll space are increasingly demonstrating robust capabilities in statutory compliance, particularly concerning the 50% Basic pay mandate and Income Tax Act 2025 reporting. However, explicit support for the 48-hour F&F settlement and nuanced state-specific regulations requires careful vendor vetting.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's comprehensive suite offers broad business functionality, but specific deep dives into its payroll and statutory compliance capabilities, particularly concerning the 50% Basic mandate and expedited F&F, were not detailed in the provided excerpts. Further investigation into Zoho Payroll is recommended.

Key tech: Extensive suite of integrated business applications

Special note for Gujarat

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Gujarat.

Pros

  • Extensive suite of integrated business applications
  • Strong brand recognition and global presence
  • Focus on privacy and data security

Cons

  • Limited specific details on payroll and statutory compliance features in provided excerpts
  • No direct mention of 48-hour F&F settlement

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender for HR and payroll, explicitly mentioning 'Statutory Compliance' with PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS. Its 'Payroll Automation' feature aims for accuracy and minimal manual work, suggesting potential alignment with wage structure mandates, though explicit 50% Basic and 48-hour F&F details require confirmation.

Key tech: Explicit mention of statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS

Special note for Gujarat

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Gujarat.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS
  • Automated payroll calculations with integration of expenses, overtime, and bonuses
  • Employee Self-Service portal for transparency and reduced HR workload

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% Basic pay mandate within CTC
  • No specific commitment to a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers a comprehensive payroll solution with a strong emphasis on statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, TDS, and LWF calculations. Its 'F&F Settlement' feature is noted, but specific timelines for expedited settlement are not detailed, nor is explicit mention of the 50% Basic pay requirement.

Key tech: Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, PT, TDS, and LWF

Special note for Gujarat

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Gujarat.

Pros

  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, PT, TDS, and LWF
  • Automated payroll processing with a focus on accuracy and speed
  • Robust Employee Self-Service (ESS) portal for employee transparency

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% Basic pay mandate within CTC
  • No specific commitment to a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 6/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned as a modern payroll solution focusing on automation and compliance. While it mentions statutory compliance, specific details regarding the 50% Basic pay mandate, the 48-hour F&F settlement, and granular state-specific requirements were not available in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Focus on automation and seamless payouts

Special note for Gujarat

Map PT + labour filings for Gujarat against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on automation and seamless payouts
  • Integration capabilities for a connected ecosystem
  • Modern, user-friendly interface implied

Cons

  • Limited specific details on statutory compliance features in provided excerpts
  • No explicit mention of 50% Basic pay mandate or 48-hour F&F settlement

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 7/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a focus on digitization, accuracy, and audit readiness for India. While it promises end-to-end payroll processing, the provided excerpts lack specific details on its adherence to the 50% Basic pay mandate, the 48-hour F&F settlement, and granular state-specific compliance nuances.

Key tech: 100% digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll

Special note for Gujarat

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Gujarat in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • 100% digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll
  • Streamlined end-to-end payroll processing
  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions

Cons

  • Lack of specific details on 50% Basic pay mandate adherence
  • No explicit mention of a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 8/10

Akrivia HCM's native India payroll engine is built for real-time rule updates and comprehensive statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS. It explicitly mentions calculating 'every component (Basic, HRA, allowances, reimbursements)' and 'Auto-Salary Revision' which suggests a capability to manage the 50% Basic mandate, though direct confirmation is pending. F&F details are absent.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates

Special note for Gujarat

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Gujarat on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance including PF, ESI, PT, TDS
  • Calculates all wage components, indicating potential for 50% Basic mandate adherence

Cons

  • No explicit mention of a 48-hour F&F settlement timeline
  • While 'Auto-Salary Revision' is mentioned, explicit confirmation of the 50% Basic pay mandate adherence requires direct verification.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Gujarat · IT (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Gujarat.
  • For Gujarat tech teams, align payroll cycles with project billing and, where relevant, contractor vs employee classification.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Gujarat).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Gujarat payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

The landscape of HR, payroll, and labour compliance in India is dynamic, requiring diligent adherence to statutory mandates. As of April 2026, businesses, particularly those in the IT sector operating in Gujarat, must navigate a complex web of regulations. This analysis focuses on key compliance areas, vendor capabilities, and the critical interplay between the Code on Wages, the Income Tax Act 2025, and state-specific nuances.

Statutory Authority and Compliance Imperatives

The Code on Wages, 2019, remains a cornerstone, with its notification mandating that basic salary must constitute at least 50% of the Cost to Company (CTC). This provision is designed to ensure a more equitable distribution of statutory contributions like Provident Fund (PF) and Gratuity, impacting the overall wage structure. Vendors must demonstrate robust capabilities in configuring CTC splits to meet this floor, with payslip generation and PF/gratuity narratives stress-tested against this requirement.

Furthermore, the Income Tax Act 2025 frames employer obligations concerning reporting, deductions, and the management of proof-of-investment. Software solutions must facilitate accurate TDS calculations, timely filings, and provide employees with the necessary tools for investment declarations and proof submissions, ensuring a defensible digital trail.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: The Compliance Dividend

Manual payroll processing is fraught with risk, especially concerning statutory remittances like Provident Fund (PF), Employee State Insurance (ESI), and Professional Tax (PT). Automation is not merely a convenience but a critical risk mitigation strategy. Vendors offering comprehensive statutory compliance modules can significantly reduce errors, avoid penalties, and ensure timely filings.

Full and Final (F&F) settlements are another area demanding precision. As per Section 17(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, wages due on termination must be settled promptly. While the Act specifies timelines, the expectation for an expedited settlement, often framed as a 48-hour mandate, is a critical service differentiator. Software solutions that streamline F&F calculations and disbursements are invaluable.

Gujarat Specifics and State Nuances

While the core Indian labour laws apply pan-India, state-level amendments and specific fund requirements necessitate localized support. For Gujarat, specific considerations may arise regarding the implementation of the Code on Wages and its impact on wage structures. If the operational context were to shift to Karnataka, adherence to the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 regarding deemed return filing would be pertinent. Similarly, for Maharashtra, the 50% Basic–CTC configuration expectations are crucial. In the context of Kerala, the Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) deduction and remittance support is a key differentiator.

Category Maturity: A 9/10 Assessment

The HR and payroll software market in India demonstrates significant maturity. Vendors offer increasingly sophisticated solutions that integrate core HR functions with advanced payroll processing and comprehensive statutory compliance. The focus has shifted from basic payroll to holistic employee lifecycle management, with AI-driven insights and automation playing a more prominent role. The primary gaps often lie in the granular, real-time interpretation and application of highly specific state-level amendments and the seamless integration of all third-party payroll-related services.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.