✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team

Last verified for May 2026

Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

Rule	Met
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).	No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.	No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.	No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Total CTC (annual ₹)

Basic pay (annual ₹)

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Assam.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Assam: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
Product	GST e-invoicing	PT automation (state-specific)	ESI / PF filing	Pricing
Zoho	Yes	Yes	Yes	No or verify with vendor
Keka	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
greytHR	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
RazorpayX Payroll	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Darwinbox	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Akrivia HCM	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes

Shorthand for Assambuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Assam · Retail

Best Retail Software in Assam

299 words · keyword: Best Retail Software in Assam

Expert verdict

Selecting HR and payroll software for Assam's retail sector in April 2026 demands a deep dive into statutory compliance, particularly concerning the 50% Basic salary rule and the Section 17(2) F&F settlement timeline. Vendors must demonstrate robust automation for ESI, PF, PT, and contractor payments, alongside accurate reporting aligned with the Income Tax Act 2025.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho's suite offers broad business functionality but lacks specific, detailed public disclosures on its payroll module's granular compliance for India's evolving statutory landscape as of April 2026. Further due diligence is required to confirm its adherence to the 50% Basic rule and Section 17(2) timelines.

Key tech: Comprehensive business software suite beyond payroll.

Special note for Assam

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Assam.

Pros

Comprehensive business software suite beyond payroll.
Potential for integration with other Zoho modules.
General compliance handling across multiple states is mentioned.

Cons

Limited specific detail on Indian payroll compliance, especially the 50% Basic rule and Section 17(2) F&F timelines.
No explicit mention of Income Tax Act 2025 reporting capabilities.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 6/10

Keka presents itself as a comprehensive HR and payroll solution with a stated commitment to compliance across all 50 states. However, specific audit-level detail regarding the 50% Basic salary configuration and the 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) settlements is not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Explicitly states 'compliance across all 50 states' for payroll.

Special note for Assam

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Assam.

Pros

Explicitly states 'compliance across all 50 states' for payroll.
Offers a broad HRMS suite including performance, time, and attendance.
Mentions payroll automation for timely payments and compliance.

Cons

Lacks granular confirmation on the 50% Basic vs CTC configuration for Indian payroll.
No clear indication of adherence to the 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) full-and-final settlements.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 7/10

greytHR highlights its focus on payroll compliance and mentions an ebook on the '50% Wage Rule Explained,' suggesting awareness of this critical mandate. However, explicit confirmation of its configuration capabilities for the 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour Section 17(2) settlement timeline requires further vendor engagement.

Key tech: Prominently features 'Payroll Compliance' and mentions an ebook on the '50% Wage Rule'.

Special note for Assam

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Assam.

Pros

Prominently features 'Payroll Compliance' and mentions an ebook on the '50% Wage Rule'.
Offers robust reporting capabilities, including state-level policies.
Addresses common HR and payroll issues with automation.

Cons

Specific configuration details for the 50% Basic vs CTC split are not fully elaborated in the provided text.
The 48-hour mandate for Section 17(2) full-and-final settlements is not explicitly confirmed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Assam

Map PT + labour filings for Assam against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Assam

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Assam in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

Scales to complex org design and policies
Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
India statutory detail varies by module rollout
Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Assam

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Assam on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

India-centric compliance messaging
Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Assam · Retail (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Assam.
For Assam retail: rosters, shift and store-level attendance, and timely statutory pay-outs for frontline staff.
Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Assam).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Assam payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Jump to

Navigating Assam's Retail HR & Payroll Compliance in April 2026

For businesses operating in Assam's dynamic retail sector, selecting HR and payroll software by April 2026 necessitates a rigorous audit of statutory compliance capabilities. The evolving labour landscape, particularly under the new wage code framework, mandates a precise understanding of how software solutions address critical obligations. Failure to align with these statutory requirements can expose businesses to significant financial penalties and operational disruptions. Therefore, a robust software choice is not merely about efficiency but about safeguarding legal standing.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Retail Operations

The retail environment often involves a high volume of transactions and a fluctuating workforce, making manual HR and payroll processes a significant risk. Automation in areas such as ESI and PF calculations, Professional Tax (PT) remittances, and contractor payments is crucial. Furthermore, the Section 17(2) mandate for full-and-final (F&F) settlements requires expedited processing. Software solutions must demonstrate their ability to manage these complex workflows accurately and within stipulated timelines, thereby mitigating the inherent risks of manual intervention.

Assam-Specific Statutory Considerations

As of April 2026, the 50% Basic salary component of CTC is a critical compliance point across India, including Assam. Software must be configurable to ensure the basic salary component meets this floor, impacting PF and gratuity calculations. While specific amendments for Assam's PT are not detailed in the provided research, general PT automation is a key consideration. Given the research context, we will evaluate against general PT capabilities and the 50% Basic vs CTC rule. The Income Tax Act 2025 reporting capabilities are also vital for accurate employer deductions and proof-of-investment documentation, enhancing digital trust.

Category Technical Maturity

7/10: The market offers mature solutions, but specific statutory nuances, especially state-level variations and emerging compliance mandates, require careful vetting beyond general feature sets.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

Security & data handling
We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.
Localization (India + state context)
India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.
Ease of use for admins and employees
Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.