SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
← SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 11 May 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for May 2026
Viewed onMay 10, 2026Updated on Data refresh10 May 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).No
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.No

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Assam.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Assam: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Assambuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Assam · IT

Best IT Software in Assam

333 words · keyword: Best IT Software in Assam

Expert verdict

Selecting HR and payroll software for Assam requires a deep dive into statutory compliance, focusing on the 50% Basic rule and timely exit settlements under Section 17(2). Vendors must demonstrate robust capabilities for the Income Tax Act 2025 reporting and adapt to state-specific nuances.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho's broad suite offers potential for integrated HR and payroll functions, but specific details regarding its April 2026 statutory compliance for Assam, particularly the 50% Basic rule and Section 17(2) exit timelines, are not explicitly detailed in the provided research. Further due diligence is required to confirm its precise adherence to these mandates.

Key tech: Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, potentially integrating payroll with other functions.

Special note for Assam

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Assam.

Pros

  • Offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, potentially integrating payroll with other functions.
  • Focus on privacy and business transformation could imply a commitment to data security.
  • Scalable for businesses of various sizes.

Cons

  • Specific payroll compliance details for Assam, including the 50% Basic rule and Section 17(2) timelines, are not readily available.
  • The excerpt does not highlight specific features for advanced statutory reporting under the Income Tax Act 2025.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 6/10

Keka positions itself as a provider of solid compliance solutions across all states, yet specific documentation confirming its April 2026 readiness for Assam's 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour Section 17(2) exit settlement mandate is absent. Its broad compliance claims require granular verification for Assam.

Key tech: Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, suggesting a broad compliance approach.

Special note for Assam

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Assam.

Pros

  • Claims to handle rules across all 50 states, suggesting a broad compliance approach.
  • Offers a unified platform for HR and payroll, aiming for seamless operations.
  • Features like 'On-time payments and compliance, no sweat!' suggest an intent towards timely settlements.

Cons

  • Research does not explicitly detail adherence to Assam's 50% Basic rule or the 48-hour Section 17(2) exit wage mandate.
  • No specific mention of capabilities aligning with Income Tax Act 2025 reporting requirements is evident.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 7/10

greytHR highlights its strength in payroll compliance and automation, including state-level policies, but direct confirmation of its April 2026 compliance for Assam's 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour Section 17(2) exit settlement is not explicitly stated. The mention of an 'Ebook: 50% Wage Rule Explained' is promising but requires direct product validation for Assam.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions 'No compliance nightmares!' and 'Payroll Compliance' as key features.

Special note for Assam

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Assam.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions 'No compliance nightmares!' and 'Payroll Compliance' as key features.
  • Offers '150+ basic and advanced admin reports covering... State-level Policies', indicating a focus on jurisdictional compliance.
  • Highlights automation for payroll processes to remove manual errors and ensure faster checkouts.

Cons

  • Specific confirmation of April 2026 compliance for Assam's 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour Section 17(2) exit wage mandate is not directly provided in the excerpt.
  • While reporting is mentioned, specific capabilities aligned with the Income Tax Act 2025's enhanced digital reporting are not detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Business banking–adjacent payroll narrative for Indian entities; suits teams already on Razorpay rails.

Key tech: Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay

Special note for Assam

Map PT + labour filings for Assam against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Strong when finance already standardises on Razorpay
  • Modern automation story for payouts and vendor bills
  • Clear India GTM alongside payment products

Cons

  • Depth vs dedicated HCM suites needs buyer diligence
  • Statutory edge cases: confirm with payroll specialists
  • Best fit when banking + payroll consolidation is a goal

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Enterprise HR cloud with payroll and compliance modules for distributed workforces.

Key tech: Scales to complex org design and policies

Special note for Assam

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Assam in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Scales to complex org design and policies
  • Employee experience and mobile apps emphasized
  • Configurable compliance for multi-country firms

Cons

  • Enterprise deals are typically longer-cycle
  • India statutory detail varies by module rollout
  • Integration planning with finance stack is key

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

HCM platform with India payroll and statutory automation positioning for mid-market.

Key tech: India-centric compliance messaging

Special note for Assam

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Assam on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • India-centric compliance messaging
  • Mid-market friendly packaging vs global megavendors
  • Configurable pay structures for wage-code debates

Cons

  • Brand footprint smaller than category leaders—reference customers matter
  • API / integration depth: confirm for your stack
  • State nuances require joint sign-off with vendor PS

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Assam · IT (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Assam.
  • For Assam tech teams, align payroll cycles with project billing and, where relevant, contractor vs employee classification.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Assam).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Assam payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Jump to

Navigating Assam's HR & Payroll Compliance: A 2026 Audit Perspective

Navigating Assam's HR & Payroll Compliance: A 2026 Audit Perspective

Choosing HR and payroll software in India, especially for a jurisdiction like Assam, necessitates a rigorous audit of statutory compliance capabilities. As of April 2026, the landscape is shaped by evolving labour codes and tax directives. Statutory authority in software selection is paramount for mitigating risks associated with ESI, PF, Professional Tax (PT), contractor payments, and crucially, the Section 17(2) mandate for timely exit settlements.

Automation vs. Manual Risk: Manual processes for ESI, PF, and PT calculations and filings are prone to errors and delays, leading to potential penalties. For Assam, specific attention must be paid to the 50% Basic salary rule under the Wage Code, ensuring CTC configurations align with this floor. Failure to adhere can result in significant financial and legal repercussions. Furthermore, the 48-hour / expedited settlement expectation for full-and-final payments upon employee exit, as per Section 17(2), demands robust system support.

Assam Specifics and Jurisdictional Nuance: For Assam, the 50% Basic vs. CTC configuration is a critical audit point. While direct mentions of Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 or Maharashtra 50% wage impact are not directly applicable to Assam's core compliance framework unless a vendor explicitly states cross-jurisdictional handling, their underlying principles of wage structuring and tax posture are instructive. Vendors must demonstrate their ability to adapt to such state-specific nuances.

Digital Trust and Income Tax Act 2025: The Income Tax Act 2025 places increased emphasis on employer reporting, accurate deduction management, and the provision of proof of investment. Software solutions must facilitate these requirements, ensuring that payroll data is not only accurate but also auditable and compliant with digital reporting mandates. This enhances digital trust and streamlines tax-related processes for both employer and employee.

Category Technical Maturity: 7/10. While many platforms offer comprehensive HR and payroll features, deep, granular statutory compliance for all Indian states, particularly under the new codes, remains a developing area. Vendors must clearly articulate their specific compliance strengths and limitations for each jurisdiction.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.