SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 22 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 21, 2026Updated on Data refresh21 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Arunachal Pradesh.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Arunachal Pradesh: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesNo or verify with vendor
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollYesYesYesYes
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Arunachal Pradeshbuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Arunachal Pradesh · Retail

Best Retail Software in Arunachal Pradesh

516 words · keyword: Best Retail Software in Arunachal Pradesh

Expert verdict

Vendors are increasingly offering robust features for statutory compliance, particularly concerning the 50% basic pay mandate and automated payroll processing. However, ensuring specific state-level nuances and the precise 48-hour F&F settlement timeline requires careful vendor vetting.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 4/10

Zoho offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, but specific payroll and deep statutory compliance details for India, especially concerning the 50% basic pay rule and expedited F&F settlements, are not clearly detailed in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Arunachal Pradesh.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Strong focus on privacy and security.
  • Scalable for businesses of all sizes.

Cons

  • Limited specific information on Indian payroll statutory compliance details in the provided research.
  • No explicit mention of F&F settlement timelines.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 7/10

Keka presents itself as a robust HR, Payroll, and PSA platform with a strong emphasis on compliance across all 50 states, including statutory reporting for PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS. However, explicit details on the 50% basic pay mandate and the 48-hour F&F settlement are not evident.

Key tech: Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Arunachal Pradesh.

Pros

  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features including PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.
  • Automated payroll processing with integrations.
  • User-friendly interface and employee self-service.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 50% basic pay rule in relation to CTC.
  • No specific callout for the 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR offers a full-suite HRMS with a strong focus on Indian payroll compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and explicitly mentions the '50% Wage Rule Explained'. While it covers F&F settlements, a specific 48-hour timeline is not detailed.

Key tech: Explicit mention of the '50% Wage Rule Explained'.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Arunachal Pradesh.

Pros

  • Explicit mention of the '50% Wage Rule Explained'.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance features and reporting.
  • Strong emphasis on employee self-service (ESS) portal.

Cons

  • No specific 48-hour timeline stated for F&F settlements.
  • While F&F settlement is mentioned, the expedited timeline is not explicitly detailed.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 5/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned as a solution for streamlining payroll and compliance in India. However, the provided excerpts lack specific details regarding the 50% basic pay mandate, F&F settlement timelines, and granular state-specific compliance features.

Key tech: Focus on streamlining payroll processes.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

Map PT + labour filings for Arunachal Pradesh against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on streamlining payroll processes.
  • Integration with Razorpay's financial ecosystem.
  • Aims for automated compliance.

Cons

  • Limited specific details on 50% basic pay rule compliance.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) / 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 6/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a focus on accuracy and audit readiness for India. While it emphasizes end-to-end payroll processing, specific details on the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement are not clearly articulated in the provided snippets.

Key tech: Global payroll solution with India-specific capabilities.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Arunachal Pradesh in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Global payroll solution with India-specific capabilities.
  • Focus on digitized, accurate, and audit-ready payroll.
  • Recognized as a Strong Performer in HCM solutions.

Cons

  • Lack of explicit detail on the 50% basic pay mandate.
  • No specific mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 8/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native Indian payroll engine with comprehensive statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and explicitly calculates components like Basic and HRA. It also mentions Tax Declaration capabilities, aligning with Income Tax Act 2025, but F&F settlement timelines are not detailed.

Key tech: Native Indian payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Arunachal Pradesh

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Arunachal Pradesh on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native Indian payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Comprehensive statutory compliance coverage.
  • Supports Tax Declaration and investment proof submissions.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of the 48-hour F&F settlement timeline.
  • While 'Basic' is calculated, the explicit 50% of CTC mandate is not directly stated as a feature.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Arunachal Pradesh · Retail (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Arunachal Pradesh.
  • For Arunachal Pradesh retail: rosters, shift and store-level attendance, and timely statutory pay-outs for frontline staff.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Arunachal Pradesh).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Arunachal Pradesh payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

The Indian retail sector, particularly in regions like Arunachal Pradesh, faces a dynamic compliance landscape. As of April 2026, adherence to the new Labour Codes, including the 50% basic pay mandate under the Wage Code, is paramount. This framework necessitates careful structuring of Cost to Company (CTC) to ensure the basic salary component meets the statutory floor, impacting PF, Gratuity, and other wage-related contributions. Failure to comply can lead to significant financial penalties and operational disruptions.

Statutory Authority and Retail Operations

Retail businesses must navigate a complex web of national and state-specific regulations. Key areas include Employee Provident Fund (EPF), Employees' State Insurance (ESI), Professional Tax (PT), and Gratuity. The Code on Wages, 2019, specifically its provision for a minimum 50% basic salary within the CTC, is a critical consideration. This impacts how compensation packages are designed, aiming to simplify wage structures and ensure a fair baseline for all employees. For the retail sector, with its diverse workforce including contractual and temporary staff, accurate payroll processing and compliance are essential for maintaining operational efficiency and employee trust.

Automation vs. Manual Risk

Manual payroll processing in retail environments is fraught with risk. Errors in calculating EPF/ESI contributions, incorrect PT deductions across various states, and non-compliance with contractor payment regulations can lead to substantial penalties. The Code on Wages emphasizes the need for standardized wage components, making automated systems indispensable. Furthermore, the 48-hour mandate for Full and Final (F&F) settlements, aligned with Section 17(2) of applicable laws, requires swift and accurate processing of all dues upon employee exit. Automation ensures that these timelines are met, mitigating legal exposure and enhancing the employee exit experience.

Arunachal Pradesh Specifics

While the core Labour Codes apply nationwide, specific interpretations and administrative procedures can vary by state. For Arunachal Pradesh, businesses must ensure their payroll systems are configured to handle any unique state-level notifications or amendments. The research did not yield specific amendments for Arunachal Pradesh in relation to Karnataka or Maharashtra, nor specific Kerala LWF details. Therefore, general compliance with the national codes is the primary focus, with a strong emphasis on the 50% basic pay rule.

Income Tax Act 2025 and Digital Trust

The Income Tax Act 2025 framework underscores the importance of digital record-keeping and reporting for employers. Payroll software must facilitate accurate deduction, remittance, and reporting of taxes (TDS). Capabilities for employees to submit proof of investments digitally and for employers to manage these declarations are crucial. This not only ensures tax compliance but also builds digital trust by providing transparent and accessible financial information to employees.

Category Maturity /10

This category of HR and payroll software demonstrates a growing maturity in addressing complex Indian statutory requirements. Vendors are increasingly offering robust features for compliance, automation, and employee self-service. However, continuous vigilance is required to ensure all state-specific nuances and evolving legal frameworks are adequately supported. The focus on the 50% basic pay rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement highlights a critical area where vendors must provide clear, auditable solutions.

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.