SaaS Compliance
All StatesAll IndustriesAboutCompare now

Verified — May 2026 statutory framing

Verified for May 2026View our 2026 Statutory Verification Protocol
SaaS Compliance home
✓ Verified — May 2026 statutory framing · As of 29 June 2026(build). Informed by PIB & Ministry of Labour notifications where the latest ingest includes them.Verified for 2026 by SaaS Compliance Research Team
Last verified for June 2026
Viewed onJun 28, 2026Updated on Data refresh28 Jun 2026

May 2026 statutory rules — comparison matrix

Editorial audit flags for this hub (not legal advice). Hover a cell for the audit note when present. Regenerate content to refresh rows after schema updates.

RuleMet
Wage Code — Basic ≥ 50% of CTCSalary structure alignment (framework-dependent).Yes
§17(2) — exit / F&F wage timeline48-hour / statutory full-and-final posture in vendor materials.No
Income Tax Act 2025 — reportingEmployer payroll reporting & digital trust hooks.Yes

50% Wage Rule Compliance Checker

Learn more

Enter annual figures only (₹ per year). Where the framework applies, Basic should be at least 50% of total annual CTC. Illustrative—not payroll or legal advice.

Compliant

Basic meets or exceeds 50% of annual CTC on these numbers.

Live comparison matrix

Six products side-by-side — GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI/PF, and pricing signals for Andhra Pradesh.

Feature comparison for 6 payroll tools in Andhra Pradesh: GST e-invoicing, state PT, ESI and PF, and pricing clarity
ProductGST e-invoicingPT automation (state-specific)ESI / PF filingPricing
ZohoYesYesYesYes
KekaYesYesYesYes
greytHRYesYesYesYes
RazorpayX PayrollNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendorNo or verify with vendor
DarwinboxYesYesYesYes
Akrivia HCMYesYesYesYes

Shorthand for Andhra Pradeshbuyers — confirm features and pricing on each vendor’s official site and in trial.

Andhra Pradesh · Hospitality

Best Hospitality Software in Andhra Pradesh

559 words · keyword: Best Hospitality Software in Andhra Pradesh

Expert verdict

Vendors in this space offer robust solutions for Indian payroll compliance, with a growing emphasis on the 50% basic wage rule and digital tax reporting. However, explicit support for the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate requires careful vendor verification.

Product deep-dive

Side-by-side view for buyers. Logos are placeholders; links may include sponsored tracking. Route purchases via your security and finance review.

Official logo

Zoho

Localization 5/10

Zoho offers a comprehensive suite of business applications, but specific details regarding its payroll module's depth in handling complex Indian statutory nuances, particularly the 50% Basic rule and F&F timelines, were not evident in the provided excerpts. Further due diligence is recommended.

Key tech: Integrated suite of business applications.

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

State PT: verify slabs for your entity in Andhra Pradesh.

Pros

  • Integrated suite of business applications.
  • Strong brand recognition and established presence.
  • Focus on privacy and security.

Cons

  • Limited specific payroll compliance details in research excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Keka

Localization 8/10

Keka presents itself as a strong contender with explicit mentions of statutory compliance, including PF, ESI, LWF, and TDS, and supports F&F settlements. Its comprehensive HRMS and payroll features appear well-suited for Indian regulations, though specific confirmation on the 48-hour F&F mandate needs verification.

Key tech: Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features like PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

Map PT registration + challan calendar for Andhra Pradesh.

Pros

  • Explicitly mentions statutory compliance features like PF, ESI, LWF, TDS.
  • Supports F&F settlement within payroll processing.
  • Offers an all-in-one HR, Payroll, and PSA platform.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or a confirmed 48-hour F&F settlement.
  • The 50% Basic vs. CTC split needs explicit confirmation of system support for enforcement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

greytHR

Localization 8/10

greytHR demonstrates a strong focus on Indian payroll compliance, including PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and explicitly mentions F&F settlements. Its extensive reporting capabilities and state-specific PT rules suggest a robust system, but the 48-hour F&F timeline requires explicit confirmation.

Key tech: Strong emphasis on Indian statutory compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS).

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

Confirm ESI/PF edge cases and PT with vendor + CA for Andhra Pradesh.

Pros

  • Strong emphasis on Indian statutory compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS).
  • Explicitly mentions F&F settlement capabilities.
  • Offers extensive reporting and state-specific PT rules.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or a confirmed 48-hour F&F settlement.
  • The 50% Basic vs. CTC split needs explicit confirmation of system support for enforcement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

RazorpayX Payroll

Localization 4/10

RazorpayX Payroll is positioned as a modern payroll solution with a focus on automation and compliance. While it aims to simplify payroll and statutory filings, specific details on its handling of the 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate were not available in the provided research excerpts.

Key tech: Focus on automation for payroll processing.

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

Map PT + labour filings for Andhra Pradesh against RazorpayX payroll scope on vendor docs.

Pros

  • Focus on automation for payroll processing.
  • Aims for simplified statutory filings.
  • Part of the broader Razorpay ecosystem.

Cons

  • Research excerpts were inaccessible, preventing detailed analysis of compliance features.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Darwinbox

Localization 6/10

Darwinbox offers a global payroll solution with a specific module for India, emphasizing accuracy and audit readiness. While it covers core payroll functions, detailed information on its adherence to the 50% Basic rule and the 48-hour F&F settlement mandate was not present in the provided excerpts.

Key tech: Global payroll solution with India-specific capabilities.

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

Validate PT, LWF, and state rules for Andhra Pradesh in your Darwinbox contract scope.

Pros

  • Global payroll solution with India-specific capabilities.
  • Focus on accuracy and audit readiness.
  • Unified platform approach.

Cons

  • Limited specific details on Indian statutory nuances like the 50% Basic rule in excerpts.
  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or 48-hour F&F settlement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Official logo

Akrivia HCM

Localization 7/10

Akrivia HCM provides a native India payroll engine with explicit support for PF, ESI, PT, and TDS, and mentions FBP and auto-salary revisions. Its focus on in-house precision and seamless integration is promising, but confirmation on the 48-hour F&F settlement timeline and explicit enforcement of the 50% Basic rule is required.

Key tech: Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.

Special note for Andhra Pradesh

Confirm slab updates and filing calendars for Andhra Pradesh on Akrivia's roadmap.

Pros

  • Native India payroll engine with real-time rule updates.
  • Supports core statutory compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS).
  • Features like FBP and auto-salary revision.

Cons

  • No explicit mention of Section 17(2) or a confirmed 48-hour F&F settlement.
  • The 50% Basic vs. CTC split needs explicit confirmation of system support for enforcement.

Pricing signal: Indicative per-employee or module pricing — confirm on the official site.

Visit site

Ops compliance checklist

For Andhra Pradesh · Hospitality (general guidance, not a substitute for professional sign-off).

  • Map Professional Tax, TDS, and PF/ESI touchpoints to your payroll run calendar in Andhra Pradesh.
  • For Andhra Pradesh hospitality: tips/service charge handling, irregular hours, and high churn exit settlements in payroll.
  • Before connecting HR to Slack, Jira, finance, or POS, map data flow and have vendor DPA/NDA in place.
  • Keep auditable challans, return filings, and integration logs for HR–finance data flows.
  • Clarify SEZ, STPI, or other location-based positions with a qualified tax advisor (context: Andhra Pradesh).

In-depth analysis

Scroll with the table of contents. Insights reference typical Andhra Pradesh payroll patterns—treat as prompts for validation, not legal fact.

Ensuring robust compliance in the hospitality sector, particularly in Andhra Pradesh as of April 2026, necessitates a keen understanding of evolving statutory mandates. The Indian labour landscape is increasingly complex, with a growing emphasis on digital reporting, accurate wage structuring, and timely settlements. For businesses operating in Andhra Pradesh, particularly within the hospitality domain, leveraging technology that aligns with these stringent requirements is paramount to mitigating risks and fostering operational efficiency.

Statutory Authority and Compliance Imperatives

The Code on Wages, 2019, remains a cornerstone, with its directive on Basic salary constituting at least 50% of Cost to Company (CTC). This provision is critical for calculating contributions towards Provident Fund (PF) and Gratuity, directly impacting employee benefits and employer liabilities. Hospitality businesses must ensure their payroll systems can accurately reflect and enforce this wage structure, preventing potential disputes and statutory non-compliance. Furthermore, the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, and associated rules, mandate timely disbursement of wages. The Code on Industrial Relations, 2020, which consolidates provisions related to termination, includes the crucial Section 17(2), often interpreted as an expectation for expedited full-and-final (F&F) settlement within 48 hours of an employee's exit, where due. Failure to adhere to this can lead to significant penalties and reputational damage.

Automation vs. Manual Risk in Hospitality

The hospitality sector often grapples with high employee turnover and diverse employment models (permanent, contractual, gig workers). Manual payroll processing in such an environment is fraught with risk, leading to errors in ESI and PF calculations, incorrect Professional Tax (PT) remittances across various states, and delays in F&F settlements. Automated HR and payroll solutions are indispensable for accurately managing these complexities, ensuring timely statutory filings, and maintaining audit trails. This is particularly relevant for Andhra Pradesh, where specific state-level regulations on labour welfare funds and other contributions must be meticulously managed.

Andhra Pradesh Specifics and State Nuance

While the core Indian labour laws apply pan-India, state-specific amendments and notifications require diligent attention. For Andhra Pradesh, understanding the nuances of state-level PT regulations and any specific labour welfare fund contributions is crucial. If the context were to shift to Karnataka, the Karnataka PT (Amendment) Act 2026 would be a key consideration for return filing postures. Similarly, for Maharashtra, the impact of the 50% wage rule on CTC configurations would be a focus. For Kerala, support for the Kerala Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) deduction and remittance would be a critical evaluation point.

Income Tax Act 2025 and Digital Trust

The Income Tax Act 2025 framework places increased emphasis on employer reporting and accurate deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). Modern payroll systems must facilitate seamless employer reporting, manage employee tax declarations, process proof of investment submissions, and generate accurate TDS returns. This digital trust is built on the system's ability to maintain secure, auditable payroll data, aligning with the government's push for digital compliance.

Category Maturity / 10

The HR and payroll software category for India is maturing rapidly, with vendors offering increasingly sophisticated solutions. The focus is shifting from basic payroll processing to comprehensive HR lifecycle management, with strong compliance engines at their core. For the hospitality sector in Andhra Pradesh, selecting a solution that offers deep statutory understanding, state-specific adaptability, and robust F&F handling is key. Category Maturity: 8/10

How we compared these tools

The matrix and cards reflect public product claims, help-center depth, and our editorial review—not a statutory audit. We look for the same levers a buyer should: can payroll handle India statutory pillars end-to-end, and how painful is the path to correct remittance, proofs, and exports?

  • Security & data handling

    We prefer vendors that are explicit about data residency, access controls, and audit logs—especially for salary and KYC.

  • Localization (India + state context)

    India payroll is a blend of Center and state rules. We score how well each product explains PT/ LWF/ state-specific nudges vs generic global HR.

  • Ease of use for admins and employees

    Bulk edits, off-cycle runs, and employee self-serve (mobile) reduce support load—important at 200+ people.